HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Waterfowl Hunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/waterfowl-hunting-7/)
-   -   3 1/2 vs. 3" (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/waterfowl-hunting/53666-3-1-2-vs-3-a.html)

ncwannabeduckhunter 02-20-2004 06:12 PM

3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
i am going to buy an autoloader and i dont know if i should get the 3 or 3.5 , is the 3 inch enough to kill geese. if it is i'll save me about a hundred bucks and go with the 3":eek:

WAYNE1 02-20-2004 06:27 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
My 3" auto does just fine. Suppose the 3 1/2's are great also....but I'm happy with what I've got;)

psandhu 02-20-2004 06:30 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
i like having a 3.5, you can shoot the same payload as the 3 but with more velocity. or shoot a bigger load at the same velocity. heck, you can buy the 3.5 and just shoot 3's our of it if you want. i use my shotgun for 98% of all my shooting...clay, doves, ducks, turkeys. i got a few other scatterguns sitting around that don't get much use.

t roy 02-21-2004 07:04 AM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
another vote for 3.5, $100 extra is worth the versatility.

TomyD 02-21-2004 01:50 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
My personal view is that 3" is enough for all geese!! I have seen many geese taken with 2 3/4". The only reason for the 3 1/2" coming into existance was because of non-toxic shot. People thought they needed big loads for it to work effectivly. This turned out not to be neccesarly true(possibly with steel it could prove and advantage)
I would therefore concentrate on the gun fit rather than the size of the cartridge!!
Best cartridge Iv found for geese and duck being Eley Bismuth maxiums (2 3/4" 34grams) And also so Bismuth magnums (3" 42grams)

Thats your English advise for the day!!

Tomy D








My freind got a 3 1/2" and hates it!! he cant use some 2 3/4" and certainly cant use 2 1/2" cartridges and has lost many chances fidling with the gas parts from light to heavy load!!

Chinchy 02-21-2004 09:35 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
If you are going to be a serious goose hunter,spring for the 3 1/2 ,if you dont you`ll regret it later! Every time a flock comes over "just a little high" you will think if I had only bought that 3 1/2 I could have killed those geese! I have a Bennili super black eagle,that I shoot doves in early season,then up to the big shell`s with never a problem!!

northoutdoors 02-24-2004 03:16 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
I am of the opposite I would tell you buy the 3" you really do not need the 3 1/2 if you want to have a 12 guage that shoots like a 10 guage buy the 10 guage. You will be a LOT happier.

In honesty the 10 guage with 3" shells will kick you less than the 12 with 3 1/2.

Next I would recomoned that you use the extra money to buy a case of hevi shot when you can find it on sale. That with a 3" is all you will need to use for geese. I prefer 2 3/4 shells and I use Kent for speed. I have found that speed is a lot better then more bb's it will put you with a better chance to take the head shot.

Well that is just my .02 cents worth though. Everyone has a different opinnion and that is why there is so much stuff out for waterfowling Aholics. We are never happy until we own or have tried them all.

plainsman 02-24-2004 08:48 PM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
With the development of some of the new 3.5" you can't go wrong, near 10 gauge performance, with versitility of a 12 gauge. It's better to be "over gunned than under gunned"
Hevi-shot is a waste of money, why pay twice as much for half the shells??Any idiot can do the math on that one.Unless you plan on 80 yd. shots, stick with steel. Steel bb"s kill out to approx. 65 yd. all you need is the pattern to hold tight enough.That's where the extra 1/2" of payload comes in, more pellets in the pattern increases you odds of killing hits. Pretty simple, isn't it?? 10 gauges and hevi-shot go hand in hand, good theory, but not practical.

TheSwamper 02-26-2004 08:58 AM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
I shoot a 3 inch 870 and I can kill anything that flies. I use BB's and have no problem dropping geese out to 40 yards. I thinka big problem with 3.5 inch guns is that people think they can shoot birds at 60 yards and that isn't the case, they just end up sky busting alot.

TomyD 02-28-2004 12:37 AM

RE: 3 1/2 vs. 3"
 
Im sorry to have to mention this, Chinchy but if a flock come in ' a little high' you should leave them no matter what gun/load you have. The idea of the 3 1/2" cartridge is not for extra range as it only really extends it about 5yds, but for extra killing power at close range!!! Any responsible hunnter should never shoot at a bird that he deems is a bit far no matter wot the cartridge!!

Tomy D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.