RC60 Vs No Flash Cuddeback
#1
RC60 Vs No Flash Cuddeback
Last Saturday I put out 3 camera's. 2 of the camera's I put In the same spot (One above the other). The 2 camera's I put together were the RC60 Reconyx (2008 model) and a No Flash Cuddeback (2006 model). I wanted to see how many pics my cuddeback would miss being I knew the RC60 wouldn't be missing any, there one outstanding camera when It comes to picking stuff up. To my surprise the cudde only missed 2 pics out of 40. I figured It was going to be more then that. The one thing I did notice was that the RC60 would trigger a second quicker then the cuddeback- Reason being, the trigger time Is much faster and the viewing range Is much wider on the RC60. Most of the 1st pics on my RC60 were head and neck shots and then the full body shots. The cuddeback pics are almost always dead center In the middle. Comparing the quality of the day time pics between the 2 I gotta say the cuddeback wins that one hands down. Yet, have I seen a camera with a better quality day time pic then a cuddeback. The night pics were a horse a piece. In the warmer temps I think the RC60 night time pics were allot better then the cuddeback. According to the Reconyx website I'm suppose to be using rechargables when It gets cold. I'm guessing that's why I wasn't as Impressed with the night time pics as I was earlier this year. The temps have been -20 to -30 below here the last week or so.
#3
RE: RC60 Vs No Flash Cuddeback
ORIGINAL: Edcyclopedia
Well...
Post them already, were not Ray Charles, we would like to see them!
Well...
Post them already, were not Ray Charles, we would like to see them!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Schultzy
Big Game Hunting
1
09-11-2008 05:38 PM