recon talon digital ir
#2
Fork Horn
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
The Talon was the last camera I reviewed. I thought that it was too expensive for what you get.
I didn't like the picture quality, but generaly do not like IR picture quality. It takes six D size batteries which is more than most. It was relatively easy to operate. Had average trigger speed. Poor locking and tree attachment capabilities. Few picture viewing options and the IR quit working within the first month.
You can read our full review at the website in the signature.
I didn't like the picture quality, but generaly do not like IR picture quality. It takes six D size batteries which is more than most. It was relatively easy to operate. Had average trigger speed. Poor locking and tree attachment capabilities. Few picture viewing options and the IR quit working within the first month.
You can read our full review at the website in the signature.
#3
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Jamestown, KY
I have 2 Talon's & 1 extreme. They are simple to operate and as far a picture quality goes, the IR is better than most commercial IR's. I also have a Leaf River IR. My B-I-L has a Cuddeback IR. The trigger is about a 4 second trigger. You just have to aim it the right way to get the best photos. It is not a camera for trails, unless you aim it up or down the trail. In bright light or a close animal you will get white out.
#6
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Jamestown, KY
I like the Talon over the Leaf Rivers. Go to www.chasingame.com they have every camera reviewed there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mossyoakhwhunter
Crossbows
4
07-17-2007 05:42 PM
Jdavenport716
Hunting Gear
1
02-19-2006 09:16 PM




