Stupid question...but just wondering...
#11
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Wheat Ridge Colorado USA
ORIGINAL: hoytusa10
Its' gonna be hard to limit myself to about 20yds in the field...have any of you taken a longer shot than 20?? I've heard a lot that most shots are on average 20 yds ne wayz...I really appreciate all your help thanks a bunch guys!!
Its' gonna be hard to limit myself to about 20yds in the field...have any of you taken a longer shot than 20?? I've heard a lot that most shots are on average 20 yds ne wayz...I really appreciate all your help thanks a bunch guys!!
In fact, longer range shots are less likely to disturb the game than close range shots so the chances of missing either are comparable. For that and a few other reasons, I don't think there's an easy answer to what ought to be an "ethical" range. That puts a lot of responsibility on the individual but then that's where the responsibility should be in any event.
#12
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
I Could,nt imagine hunting with a compound, recurves & longbows lend themselves to a more harmonious outcome in 99% of hunting situations. Ive shot a recurve since 1975 at the age of 12, I'll stick with it till the end, to much fun and ive killed a pile of deer with them too.
#13
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Saegertown PA meadville,pa,us
I've hunted before there were compounds allowed in the field and I've actually taken a few deer with wheels but I've taken more than 50 big game animals with longbows and recurves and it really never enters my mind about there being a difference in the equipment when it comes to shooting game. When an animal crosses that "mental line" I know I'm going to kill it and the equipment doesn't really factor in.




