Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
05-26-2008 | 09:46 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 0
From: Norman OK USA
Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
I'm pretty sure that the new shafts are the same weight and diameter as the original axis, but the the Easton spec charts don't provided the actual diameter. And since my shafts all have the label removed... I can't remember if they're 9.5 gpi like the new shafts.
Anyone have any ideas?
Anyone have any ideas?
05-27-2008 | 12:27 PM
#3
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
RE: Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
They are supposed to be the same diameter and weight. Supposedly stronger; and have less oscillation both coming off the string and entering a target. And the surface finish is smoother.
05-31-2008 | 06:49 AM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
RE: Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
ORIGINAL: twofinger
Has anyone used the 3 inch duravane.i just picked some up for my new nano's and also put the on my wifes bow with a wisker. has anyone ever tried the 3 inch duravane?
Has anyone used the 3 inch duravane.i just picked some up for my new nano's and also put the on my wifes bow with a wisker. has anyone ever tried the 3 inch duravane?
