Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
05-26-2008, 09:46 PM
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Norman OK USA
Posts: 3,318
Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
I'm pretty sure that the new shafts are the same weight and diameter as the original axis, but the the Easton spec charts don't provided the actual diameter. And since my shafts all have the label removed... I can't remember if they're 9.5 gpi like the new shafts.
Anyone have any ideas?
Anyone have any ideas?
05-27-2008, 12:27 PM
#3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,127
RE: Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
They are supposed to be the same diameter and weight. Supposedly stronger; and have less oscillation both coming off the string and entering a target. And the surface finish is smoother.
05-31-2008, 06:49 AM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,876
RE: Original Axis vs. N-Fused Axis
ORIGINAL: twofinger
Has anyone used the 3 inch duravane.i just picked some up for my new nano's and also put the on my wifes bow with a wisker. has anyone ever tried the 3 inch duravane?
Has anyone used the 3 inch duravane.i just picked some up for my new nano's and also put the on my wifes bow with a wisker. has anyone ever tried the 3 inch duravane?
