I just wanted to see if anyone had any experience with these arrows and could give me any pros or cons to them. One of my local shops is trying to push them. They advertise that you get better penetration with the smaller diameter arrows. Is that true? What would be the drawbacks to a smaller diameter arrow, if any? Thanks!!

I just bought a dozen on the 400's a little bit ago. I haven't shot them at any deer yet but they seem to fly very straight and I am getting tight groups out of them.

These replaced the ST Axis arrows. I loved the original ST Axis and will be trying out the new Nano's or N-Fused. The originals shot very well out of my bow. The only con I have is they cost more than the originals.

The weight is the same and seem to fly the same (great) as the original ST Axis. I have heard they are tougher. I guess Easton needed to come up with a "new and improved" product for 2008.

There are advantages and disadvantages to smaller shafts, but I like my FMJ's. I have sold several of the black all carbon Axis shafts and the Feedback I get on them is good.

Dan

I have shot black Axis 400 arrows fletched with blazers for the past 3 years with good success on the 3D range and in the field. They fly great and penetrate well. I picked up a dozen of the N-fused axis to try out. They are supposed to be a little stronger and tougher. If I get the same performance as the original Axis, I will be very happy.

What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Disadvantage I believe it takes a broadhead adaptor per Easton.
Advantage is the finish and diameter does allow for less drag therefore more penetration when enter an animal's flesh (not bone).
My .02.