A/C or All Carbon?
12-29-2007 | 05:19 PM
#41
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
From:
RE: A/C or All Carbon?
ORIGINAL: nodog
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I ran my easton shaft selector program and it told me that you will need a 340 spine with a 100 grain tip, 29.25 draw length and 70# for the FMJ's.
Mat
12-29-2007 | 05:27 PM
#42
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
From:
RE: A/C or All Carbon?
ORIGINAL: whitetailbowhunter
Nodog,
I ran my easton shaft selector program and it told me that you will need a 340 spine with a 100 grain tip, 29.25 draw length and 70# for the FMJ's.
Mat
ORIGINAL: nodog
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I ran my easton shaft selector program and it told me that you will need a 340 spine with a 100 grain tip, 29.25 draw length and 70# for the FMJ's.
Mat
Thanks Mat!
Dan
12-29-2007 | 07:38 PM
#43
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
RE: A/C or All Carbon?
ORIGINAL: whitetailbowhunter
Nodog,
I ran my easton shaft selector program and it told me that you will need a 340 spine with a 100 grain tip, 29.25 draw length and 70# for the FMJ's.
Mat
ORIGINAL: nodog
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I figured the 340 but with the composite construction I thought it might go for the 400. You guys really like the weight. Since I shoot a 100grn. head the 400 still might cut it?
I ran my easton shaft selector program and it told me that you will need a 340 spine with a 100 grain tip, 29.25 draw length and 70# for the FMJ's.
Mat
LikeI said earlier some are stiffer and some weaker. Always had to shoot the 75/95 gt. Some who've shot the Bemans used the 400. Theyare almost to stiff for me in the 340. Will not hit where the maxima's do.
12-29-2007 | 07:41 PM
#44
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
RE: A/C or All Carbon?
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
I think you will find Eastons are very consistent in spine, won't argue about other brands but if they are spined and manufactured correctly a .400 spine should deflect.400
My FMJ's just hit lower than my CX Maximas, neither left nor right. I have shot 5 arrows of varying brands out of my Guardian and shot pretty decent groups. I was actually surprised, although it was at only 20 yards.
Dan
I think you will find Eastons are very consistent in spine, won't argue about other brands but if they are spined and manufactured correctly a .400 spine should deflect.400
My FMJ's just hit lower than my CX Maximas, neither left nor right. I have shot 5 arrows of varying brands out of my Guardian and shot pretty decent groups. I was actually surprised, although it was at only 20 yards.Dan
Was that with the large broadheads (1 1/8- 1 3/16)? I don't have much of a problem with points.
01-02-2008 | 01:43 PM
#47
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
RE: A/C or All Carbon?
ORIGINAL: Huntin Junkie
I just bought a dozen full metal jackets for hunting. I love'em. They are an all around better hunting arrow in my opinion.
I just bought a dozen full metal jackets for hunting. I love'em. They are an all around better hunting arrow in my opinion.
Only 42 more posts and you won't be a fawn anymore.
I pack'm after I stack'm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buckeye
Archery Gear
0
03-08-2006 06:17 PM
