Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Sporting Dogs
 National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941. >

National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

Sporting Dogs What's the best dog for what type of game? Find out what other hunters think.

National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

Old 12-29-2007, 08:40 AM
  #11  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 860
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

We have blackberry bushes here probably the same stuff as rasberry. Seattle is very wet. The stuff grows so thick that only rabbits and rats are able to penetrate inplaces. I shot a pheasant last November and it dropped in that stuff. My dog couldn't get it. She was actuallystepping on the bushes climbing trying to reach it.

I've seen small springers slip in there when they can. The holes are usually the size of a football.

Now, Hawai'i had some Keawi trees (related to Mesque). Dogs can go in but I wouldn't try it. Thornstypically grow up to an inch long. There's been times when stepping on them, they drew blood thru the soles of my boots.
Mite is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:11 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

To quote every author that I ever read about training hunting dogs, labs only win because just about every single person that competes has a lab. They are not better then any other dog. It's a numbers game. I don't know why people don't understand this.
bkitchen0406 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 10:49 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 5,195
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

ORIGINAL: bkitchen0406

To quote every author that I ever read about training hunting dogs, labs only win because just about every single person that competes has a lab. They are not better then any other dog. It's a numbers game. I don't know why people don't understand this.
i feel there is no other dog that trains on commands and retrieves as good as LAB. none i know of,just my opinion..

now, put LAB on phesant,grouse,rabbit,there are MANY dogs for many reasons that can do it better than lab.

but for water/retrieving ,i rate the LAB as NO.1...

as for the ALL AROUND DOG,HUNTING/HOME , i feel they are best.

if LAB is not in shape,under 80 pds on male,they are not a dog to have for hunting here in mountains of pa.
heat/weight of lab is his biggest problem..

i seen labs that their tongues almost touched ground,they were out of shape,bigtime...
sproulman is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 02:59 PM
  #14  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: golden co
Posts: 852
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

ORIGINAL: bkitchen0406

To quote every author that I ever read about training hunting dogs, labs only win because just about every single person that competes has a lab.
What authors, books, and page numbers? Me thinks folks would run poodles if they believed they could be NFC.
losthwy is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:53 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, WI
Posts: 81
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

bkitchen0406 has a point. say you took the top ten dogs from the following breeds:

lab, golden, ches, spanish water dog, portuguese water dog, standard poodle, nova scotia, curly coat, flat coat, and why not through in about four of the versitile breeds and four different spaniel breeds. . . (forgive me if i've overlooked anyones personal favorite)

this would give you 170 dogs.

losthwy, you are making it sound like the labs would take the top ten spots.
arch is offline  
Old 01-11-2008, 05:22 PM
  #16  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: golden co
Posts: 852
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

ORIGINAL: arch

losthwy, you are making it sound like the labs would take the top ten spots.
In retriever fields trials they normally do.
losthwy is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 11:24 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cottage Grove, WI
Posts: 81
Default RE: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.

ORIGINAL: losthwy

In retriever fields trials they normally do.
that would be like me saying pointers normally win pointing trials. aren't they expected to?

let me try to restatethe numbers argument. if only one golden competes with 99 labs the odds are good that a lab will have the best performance that day. if one lab competes with 99 goldens the outcome could be different.
arch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MdDave
Bowhunting
16
02-09-2008 08:40 PM
DDgoonies
Official IBO.Net Forum - 3-D Shooting
1
08-20-2003 06:40 AM
fishfam
Official IBO.Net Forum - 3-D Shooting
0
01-04-2003 08:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: National Field Champions (Retrievers) since 1941.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.