204 Ruger for Coyotes
02-10-2014 | 05:55 PM
#31
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
From:
The .204 has similar ballistic performance to the .22-250 but uses 1/3 less powder, admittedly with a smaller pill !
I use one..................... I like it !
I use one..................... I like it !
Last edited by Sheridan; 02-14-2014 at 08:45 PM.
02-12-2014 | 09:48 AM
#33
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 2
From: Kansas
Brilliant contribution to the forum thus far, kudos. 4 posts in a single thread, 3 of them bringing nothing but insults. Take your own advice, you're a bit tightly wound, my friend.
Last edited by CalHunter; 02-12-2014 at 01:29 PM.
02-12-2014 | 01:33 PM
#34
Super Moderator
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,767
Likes: 12
From: Northern California
Thanks especially to NoMercy and to RidgeRunner for exhibiting a lot of patience. As you can see, I've "moderated/edited" somebody else's inappropriate comments and somebody now has a 2-week timeout. Hopefully he reads the rules and follows them when he comes back as further violations will result in a longer time out up to and possibly including the dreaded permaban.
CalHunter
Moderator
CalHunter
Moderator
02-12-2014 | 01:50 PM
#35
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 1
From: Eastern wv
It never ceases to amaze me how folks can trash a rifle cartridge by what they have saw, sure the 204 at its best (a load it likes with a good bullet) will shoot rings around a 223 that's not at it's full potential, however, if they would have seen Richard Mathewson take his 223 contender carbine on that June day in 1999 and kill a prairie dog at 1,115 yards it would give them something to think about. They just can't lose the mentality of "If I can't do it it can't be done"
RR
RR
