Community
Scopes and Sights Discuss firearm scopes, sights and related accessories here.

Need a 300 yd scope

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-14-2010 | 04:17 PM
  #31  
Chuck7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,123
Likes: 3
From: Central Florida
Default

Scope arrived..It's wonderful and I can see CLEAR for a long ways..before mounting I'm going to the local gunstore and getting better mounts but in..then to a friends house to lazer sight it in and then to the range..

Summary...best scope I've ever looked through..cystal clear
Chuck7 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-14-2010 | 07:43 PM
  #32  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah, you got a great scope. Way better choice to spend a little bit on a quality scope like that rather than going with a cheap $50-80 scope.
hometheaterman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2010 | 02:20 PM
  #33  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by bigbulls
It's just their name for a standard duplex reticle.
Today's good glass is light years better than excellent glass of 20 or 30 years ago.
There's a lot more to it than that.
Actually not really. We use same coatings at our company but for other purposes and wavelengths for filters of light.

Glass is still being ground down like the way it was 50 years ago. Yield is a big factor, and lots of new methods for determining quality of the shape cut. Lots of new test gear out there to map the shape.

But the trick is matching the index of refaction of the air to your eye under any circumstances, from dry air, to humid and over a huge temp range. Lots of new coatings also enhance parts of the visible spectrum at twilight like the conquest line. Those guys really have thier technique down. So does leupold with the VX3 line and Mark4 line is just plain awesome. Our one setup that coats is a 5mil investment. Once setup, your just recouping R&D cost. Back reflection is your enemy, and coatings help there and is directly coorelated to index matching.

I myself will not buy anything of lesser quality than a conquest, monarch, or VX3 or Vari-X III, or 4200. The 4200 is ok, but not as durable as a Leupold fixed 4. My 460Smith destroys 4200's.

My wants are Mark4's, but can't afford too many of those.
 
Reply
Old 06-15-2010 | 02:45 PM
  #34  
LifexIsxHunting's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Central, WI
Default

Originally Posted by SWThomas
Nikon ProStaff are great cheap scopes. I prefer Nikon Monarch because they're higher quality glass but they're more expensive.
+1 The Nikon is a great scope the Prostaff 3-9x40 if I remember right is $160 and the 3-9x50 Prostaff about $200. But if you can get the extra cash the Monarch line is amazing.
LifexIsxHunting is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.