Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Scopes and Sights
Opinions on the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42, MilDot >

Opinions on the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42, MilDot

Scopes and Sights Discuss firearm scopes, sights and related accessories here.

Opinions on the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42, MilDot

Old 01-27-2010, 06:24 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Default Opinions on the Nikon Monarch 4-16x42, MilDot

I am new to rifles, been shooting handguns for some time now, and I'd like to get everyones opinion on the above listed scope. It will be going on a .308 rifle which will primarily be used at the range between 100-600 yds. I would eventually like to move up to 1000yds as my skill level increases (hopefully).
It's likely that I will be doing some hunting with this rifle from time to time also, therefore a variable power scope is what I'm leaning towards.

I can have this scope for $350.00 shipped. I have searched everywhere online (countless articles and forums) trying to find the best scope to suit my needs for under $400.
If you do not have any experience with this scope feel free to suggest another brand, model, magnification within the budget. Anything you feel is the best bang for my buck will be greatly appreciated.
ituarte is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:41 PM
  #2  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 17
Default

A Nikon Monarch is a good scope. I would lean towards a BDC over a Mildot. Using a mildot for ranging is complicated. Outside of a military/defense application where you don't want the signature of an laser rangefinder, there's really not much use. Also, the dots on a mildot will be relatively large covering 1 yard at 1000 yards. Finally, at 1,000 yards, if your budget can stand to go with a 50mm objective I think you'll find it worth the extra although the 42mm should be adequate.

Also in that price range you can get a Sightron SII series scope.
quickdraw62 is offline  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:22 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

I use Burris scopes (signature select line), but I use Nikon Monarch's for my binos.


The Monarch line is excellent (okay, very good), certainly for the money.


http://www.chuckhawks.com/recommended_riflescopes.htm


http://www.chuckhawks.com/scopes_price_class.htm


Look here for price comparison shopping;

http://www.opticsplanet.net/riflescopes.html


Good luck - I think it's a good buy, IMO
Sheridan is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 06:02 AM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,568
Default

I don't have the scope you are asking about, but, I do have the monach 5.5 x 16.5 with the regular reticle and I don't like the scope in the higher magnifications. Above 10 power, it fuzzes up and is hard to use at long ranges. I've had a couple of monach 3x9's and really liked them but to me, that extra magnification above 10 power is a waste on the monarch.
rockytop is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:56 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

Check the Vortex Viper line-up. The 4-12 X 40 with the dead hold BDC reticle is good and withing your price range. I'd recommend you check out the Sample List over at S.W.F.A.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 02-09-2010, 04:46 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,925
Default

I have a Monarch... very nice scope. No complaints here.
Doe Dumper is offline  
Old 02-22-2010, 02:07 PM
  #7  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: In the country
Posts: 156
Default

Great opinions everyone!
jaywalker is offline  
Old 03-15-2010, 08:10 PM
  #8  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner View Post
This is not correct, on its calibrated power a dot in a mil-dot reticle is 1/4 mil wide so it covers up 9" at 1000 yards
RR
My bad. I thought this reticle was in the first focal plane
quickdraw62 is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 05:43 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sniper151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornwall, Pa.
Posts: 1,720
Default

I agree with quickdraw, the mil dot would not be my choice if you are looking to get into long range or competition shooting. I would spring for the larger, adjustable windage and elevation knobs and a fine or 1/4" dot retacle.
Sniper151 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.