Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
03-09-2005 | 11:42 AM
#31
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Actually, the most recent poll results were from 900 respondents.
Any first year college kid in statistics 101 knows that would be an adequate sample.
Any first year college kid in statistics 101 knows that would be an adequate sample.
03-09-2005 | 12:10 PM
#36
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
TYPO, hmmm sorry but I don't see it as that. Could have been but the result is plain for any moderator to see.
BTBOWHUNTER it was 750 an is posted as so on the PGC's website. Though I agree that 900 is a valid number to poll, provided the poll is not used to support their own propoganda. Why did they not disclose how many of those 750 were either employeed by or related (spouses) to the PGC? The PGC was caught doing this before..holding meetings with a high % of volunteer DWCOs and their spouses in attendance to gain support for programs.
Like I stated earlier no company (PGC) supported thru stockholders (lisc. buyers)operates in 2005 as they did in 1965. Today the stockholders are demanding honest answers and proof of them.
I'll bet I could get 750 -900 names on a petition this week, yet for repelling AR, even closing all anterless seasons for a year or two. it would have as valid as any "poll" done by the PGC...and I'll disclose whom signed it!
BTBOWHUNTER it was 750 an is posted as so on the PGC's website. Though I agree that 900 is a valid number to poll, provided the poll is not used to support their own propoganda. Why did they not disclose how many of those 750 were either employeed by or related (spouses) to the PGC? The PGC was caught doing this before..holding meetings with a high % of volunteer DWCOs and their spouses in attendance to gain support for programs.
Like I stated earlier no company (PGC) supported thru stockholders (lisc. buyers)operates in 2005 as they did in 1965. Today the stockholders are demanding honest answers and proof of them.
I'll bet I could get 750 -900 names on a petition this week, yet for repelling AR, even closing all anterless seasons for a year or two. it would have as valid as any "poll" done by the PGC...and I'll disclose whom signed it!
03-09-2005 | 12:32 PM
#38
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Page 12 March 05 Game News....
Not sure what poll you're talking about but the most recent one was done by Responsive Management, an outside contractor in May 0f 04 and 900 hunters were polled. Only 10% dissatisfied, 79% satisfied, 11% neither.
Haven't seen the likes of USP use an outside polling co. Wonder if they're afraid of the results?
Not sure what poll you're talking about but the most recent one was done by Responsive Management, an outside contractor in May 0f 04 and 900 hunters were polled. Only 10% dissatisfied, 79% satisfied, 11% neither.
Haven't seen the likes of USP use an outside polling co. Wonder if they're afraid of the results?
03-09-2005 | 12:46 PM
#39
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
The poll they did for AR that I refered to in my earlier post. Was done by PSU and presented at the commissioners meeting before they voted on AR. I was there! That's a fact!