HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   Did ARs Really Produce bigger 2.5+ Buck? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/304745-did-ars-really-produce-bigger-2-5-buck.html)

BTBowhunter 09-24-2009 04:27 PM


Originally Posted by bluebird2 (Post 3452850)
Alt did not use the wrong grammar as you claim. If he did the PGC would have corrected his grammar in the Hunting Digest which included that quote from 2002 to 2008. The basic reason for implementing ARs was to improve the genetics of the herd as a result of dominant breeding by superior 2.5+ buck. If that was not the case, then there was no reason to implement ARs other than to get hunters to shoot more doe.


And I'll say it again. NO ONE else drew the conclusion you did. Except for your "english teacher" (if she exists) LOL!! You dismiss the research of wildlife professionals like Kroll and ask your english teacher to help interperet a statement about deer management.... Priceless!!

bluebird2 09-24-2009 04:34 PM

And I will say this once again. Only a buffoon like you would claim to know that no one drew the same conclusion that I drew from Alt's statement. Words have meaning and when they are printed in the Digest year after year it is not a grammatical error. It is a claim that is supported by the PGC.

BTBowhunter 09-24-2009 04:39 PM


Originally Posted by bluebird2 (Post 3452870)
And I will say this once again. Only a buffoon like you would claim to know that no one drew the same conclusion that I drew from Alt's statement. Words have meaning and when they are printed in the Digest year after year it is not a grammatical error. It is a claim that is supported by the PGC.


Therein lies your problem. You dwell on the miniscule meaningless minutia of some technical point that makes zero practical sense. You had to consult an english teacher for cryin out loud! You know thats not what was meant or said. Once again its the old Bluebird twist at its finest.

Cornelius08 09-24-2009 04:47 PM

Lmao. Tell me you didnt just say "minutia". :D

BTBowhunter 09-24-2009 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by Cornelius08 (Post 3452895)
Lmao. Tell me you didnt just say "minutia". :D


Whatsa matter? Too big a word for ya?

bluebird2 09-24-2009 04:52 PM


Therein lies your problem. You dwell on the miniscule meaningless minutia of some technical point that makes zero practical sense. You had to consult an english teacher for cryin out loud! You know thats not what was meant or said. Once again its the old Bluebird twist at its finest.
Wrong again. Alt lied when he said hunters would see more buck than ever before and he lied when he said those buck would be bigger than ever before and you are lying when you are denying that he said what he said and which the PGC repeated over again and which is still posted on the PGC website.

Cornelius08 09-24-2009 05:01 PM

You cultured enough to say words like minutia?

'Cordin' to Pensyltucky game comision We hunters jus' be ignernt rednecks 'round 'ere. Yer 2 smart. You haint one dem greeny autobahn sob's r ya?:s12:

Lmao.:D

BTBowhunter 09-24-2009 05:05 PM


Originally Posted by bluebird2 (Post 3452907)
Wrong again. Alt lied when he said hunters would see more buck than ever before and he lied when he said those buck would be bigger than ever before and you are lying when you are denying that he said what he said and which the PGC repeated over again and which is still posted on the PGC website.

I didnt deny anything Alt said. I simply dispute your goofy interperetation of what was said.

BTBowhunter 09-24-2009 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by Cornelius08 (Post 3452917)
You cultured enough to say words like minutia?

'Cordin' to Pensyltucky game comision We hunters jus' be ignernt rednecks 'round 'ere. Yer 2 smart. You haint one dem greeny autobahn sob's r ya?:s12:

Lmao.:D

I'll try to stick to one or two syllables when I know you're here LOL

bluebird2 09-24-2009 05:14 PM

And , as I said before, that means you don't understand the English language ,even though you admitted Alt didn't use the proper grammar. BTW, how do you know whether Alt was lying or if he just lied in the first part of his statement and used improper grammar in the second part?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.