USP President OK with deer audit contractor
This deerprogram audits validity, even though it has yet to begin, has been a subject for debate here in recent weeks. The May 22 issue of PA outdoor news contains some interesting quotes from none other than Seve Mohr, president of the USP.
From PA outdoor news May 22, 2009, Front page article titled At last, deer audit slated: Mohr Contends that Unified wants "to get the factson the table" about deer management and believes the audit will help. He expressed confidence that WMI will not defend the commission as some Unified members have claimed. "WMI has a national reputation to uphold, and I can't see that they would jeopardize that reputation by reporting something that is not true" "We are going to expect WMI to come up with the documented facts. Our lawsuit can proceed at the same time as the audit -they are two totally different things" |
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
"WMI has a national reputation to uphold, and I can't see that they would jeopardize that reputation by reporting something that is not true" WMI has already said they support diversity,so they will have no problem justifying the amount of HR the PGC has implemented. |
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
Bb going by that theory you could say they are out to get the pgc or they are this or that. But until they do the job does anyone have any proof or facts to say what they will do
|
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
I have the proof that WMI supports biodiversity which means they support the PGC HR plan. What do you have to offer in defense of WMI?
|
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
Nodda but i am not saying hip hip hooray the audit will Grrreat either
|
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
That is a reasonable position to take and I don't have a problem with that.
|
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
ORIGINAL: bowtruck Nodda but i am not saying hip hip hooray the audit will Grrreat either |
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
But you claimed the audit would be objective even though you had nothing to support that claim. So you were cheerleading!!!
|
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 But you claimed the audit would be objective even though you had nothing to support that claim. So you were cheerleading!!! LOL, you really need to read before you post or maybe you need to go back and read slower. I've said several times in this thread and another that the audit deserves scrutiny once complete but any audit should have the expectation of objectivity before it starts. Please point out one example of a state agency or other organization proving bias on the part of WMI in some past evaluation in this field. If an organization that has done contract work for 40 state agencies and 4 provinces has a tendency toward bias, surely some proof of said bias would be available from some past client. |
RE: USP President OK with deer audit contractor
LOL, you really need to read before you post or maybe you need to go back and read slower. I've said several times in this thread and another that the audit deserves scrutiny once complete but any audit should have the expectation of objectivity before it starts. Please point out one example of a state agency or other organization proving bias on the part of WMI in some past evaluation in this field. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.