LOL, you really need to read before you post or maybe you need to go back and read slower. I've said several times in this thread and another that the audit deserves scrutiny once complete but any audit should have the expectation of objectivity before it starts.
That is not what you said in the quote I provided. You decared that the audit would be objective based solely on your opinion.
Please point out one example of a state agency or other organization proving bias on the part of WMI in some past evaluation in this field.
It is impossible to prove an inherent bias when deer management is subjective rather than objective. If the PA audit was based on the number of deer the habitat can support the audit would make the PGC look like idiots. But if the audit is based on the biodiversity carrying capacity the PGC will look like heroes.