WE'LL WAIT TILL THEY DIE
#12
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
I dont think it is any one generations fault . I feel it is more of the tech age with all the new devices readly
avalibl to keep them busy rather than a walk in the woods plinking a bb gun . When i was a kid there wasnt
a thing to do inside . Tv wasnt all that great of course only getting 1 or 2 channels by spinning antena.
Daytime tv notta thing on night time local news world news 60 minutes yea as a kid those were fun to watch
wheel of fortune/jeporty/ family feud wasnt great but better than nothing
avalibl to keep them busy rather than a walk in the woods plinking a bb gun . When i was a kid there wasnt
a thing to do inside . Tv wasnt all that great of course only getting 1 or 2 channels by spinning antena.
Daytime tv notta thing on night time local news world news 60 minutes yea as a kid those were fun to watch

wheel of fortune/jeporty/ family feud wasnt great but better than nothing
#13
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: livbucks
I was raised to never shoot a doe by the old folks. This mentality originated in the very old days when there were no deer to speak of. I'm smart enough to know that it is necessary now. There is no shortage of hunters that enjoy doing just that. You are espousing doomsday scenarios again BB.
I was raised to never shoot a doe by the old folks. This mentality originated in the very old days when there were no deer to speak of. I'm smart enough to know that it is necessary now. There is no shortage of hunters that enjoy doing just that. You are espousing doomsday scenarios again BB.
If you want to see how many hunters are passing on doe ,just look at the archery harvest stats. Or, you can look at the ratio of antlerless tags to the number of doe harvested. In 2000 780K tags produced a harvest of 302K antlerless ,but in 2007 869K tags only produced a harvest of 213K doe
so ,if hunting is better than ever ,isn't it obvious that a lot of hunters are passing on doe?.
#14
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
ORIGINAL: livbucks
I was raised to never shoot a doe by the old folks. This mentality originated in the very old days when there were no deer to speak of. I'm smart enough to know that it is necessary now. There is no shortage of hunters that enjoy doing just that. You are espousing doomsday scenarios again BB.
I was raised to never shoot a doe by the old folks. This mentality originated in the very old days when there were no deer to speak of. I'm smart enough to know that it is necessary now. There is no shortage of hunters that enjoy doing just that. You are espousing doomsday scenarios again BB.
when dad took us hunting,he would only let us kill a few doe in each area.
this was publicland.
other hunters would not hunt in your area, they went elsewhere.
also dad would say,DONT SHOOT LITTLE BUCKS.
FUNNY, THATS WHAT AR IS DOING NOW.
we had deer.
NOW, you have 3 deer left in area,doors open on trucks, out comes hunters as far as harrisburg to kill the few doe that are left.
9 different crews drove same area after those 3 doe.
they got 1.
i said to one crew,HEY GUYS, HOW ABOUT LAYING OFF DOE THERE ARE SO FEW.
the one that was going to college in harrisburg said to me, SPROUL WE SAW HERDS of deer here in oct muzzleloader season,we shot 1 then too.
i think he was LEADER of crew too.

#16
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Or, you can look at the ratio of antlerless tags to the number of doe harvested. In 2000 780K tags produced a harvest of 302K antlerless ,but in 2007 869K tags only produced a harvest of 213K doe
so ,if hunting is better than ever ,isn't it obvious that a lot of hunters are passing on doe?.
Or, you can look at the ratio of antlerless tags to the number of doe harvested. In 2000 780K tags produced a harvest of 302K antlerless ,but in 2007 869K tags only produced a harvest of 213K doe
so ,if hunting is better than ever ,isn't it obvious that a lot of hunters are passing on doe?.
#17
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
when dad took us hunting,he would only let us kill a few doe in each area.
this was publicland.
this was publicland.
It all works out to an inconsistent use of the harvest as a means of controlling the herd across the landscape. Some hunters are unsatisfied and the GC does not get the harvest
that is warranted in the denser pockets of concentration.
#18
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
In the populated areas there are very few SGL's andmost if not all other lands are posted. If I didn't own a few acres myself, I too would be on SGL's.
Up in thebig woods, there are those who claim that there are a lot of deer, I had posted on that PGC site that they should tell others hunters where all these deer are at. Then they said that hunters have to scout on thereown to find these spots. Seems to me, if they really believed that the herd should be reduced, they would tell hunters where these deer are at. To me they are either liars about all the deer they see or they are greedy and want them all for themselves.
Up in thebig woods, there are those who claim that there are a lot of deer, I had posted on that PGC site that they should tell others hunters where all these deer are at. Then they said that hunters have to scout on thereown to find these spots. Seems to me, if they really believed that the herd should be reduced, they would tell hunters where these deer are at. To me they are either liars about all the deer they see or they are greedy and want them all for themselves.
#19
"I am becoming more and more convinced that wildlife management would be better off if we worked from the general fund and told hunters to take a flying leap with their money." R.S. Bodenhorn - PA Game Commission WCO of Elk County
Sounds like something that would come out of his mouth.Retirement can't came soon enough for employees like him.
Sounds like something that would come out of his mouth.Retirement can't came soon enough for employees like him.
#20
ORIGINAL: livbucks
A lot of the problem with things is the longer season on antlerless. Hunters have far more opportunity to fill those tags now. I've never cared for concurrent seasons personally. People also seem to take no peronal responsibility for their actions. Many areas need hunting pressure and some need a break. The GC has a limit to how small they can break down the WMUs. This is where the common sense should kick in on the hunter's part. Instead of sitting in the same spots that aren't producing, why not go where the deer are actually at? This is why the longer concurrent season's are messing with you guys. A hunter will wait out a spot in a low density area and shoot the last doe there. instead of hitting a more productive area that can use the harvest. Scouting and productive efforts are lost when hunters are no longer under the gun to fill that tag within a three day window.
A lot of the problem with things is the longer season on antlerless. Hunters have far more opportunity to fill those tags now. I've never cared for concurrent seasons personally. People also seem to take no peronal responsibility for their actions. Many areas need hunting pressure and some need a break. The GC has a limit to how small they can break down the WMUs. This is where the common sense should kick in on the hunter's part. Instead of sitting in the same spots that aren't producing, why not go where the deer are actually at? This is why the longer concurrent season's are messing with you guys. A hunter will wait out a spot in a low density area and shoot the last doe there. instead of hitting a more productive area that can use the harvest. Scouting and productive efforts are lost when hunters are no longer under the gun to fill that tag within a three day window.


