HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   Mohr needs to regroup (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/285319-mohr-needs-regroup.html)

bluebird2 02-05-2009 08:39 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 

LOL I absolutely can assure you that Jim didn't plagarize. I happen to know his source for the facts he used and he didn't copy anything

< Message edited by BTBowhunter -- 2/5/2009 7:10:11 AM >

At least when Bluebabble posts about deer management, he does do some research to be able to use his twisted distortions but in this case, it's painfully obvious that he really has no clue what your posts mean this time, Jim. If he did, he would never have claimed plagarism because the source or your information would be obvious to anyone with even a remote degree of understanding on this particular issue.
Even if he paraphrased the info, it is still plaigarism.

bawanajim 02-05-2009 08:48 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 

ORIGINAL: bluebird2


LOL I absolutely can assure you that Jim didn't plagarize. I happen to know his source for the facts he used and he didn't copy anything

< Message edited by BTBowhunter -- 2/5/2009 7:10:11 AM >

LOL I absolutely can assure you that Jim didn't plagarize. I happen to know his source for the facts he used and he didn't copy anything

< Message edited by BTBowhunter -- 2/5/2009 7:10:11 AM >

I will have to admit tobeing mystifiedwhen trying to understand the point you are incapable of making with your own written words.

And I will post this again just in case you missed it the first time.:eek:

All of the above post were written solely without assist by myself with knowledge gained through hands on work and studies in the field. I will swear to that on any mans bible.


DennyF 02-05-2009 09:03 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
I have yet to receive any satisfaction from the vocal minority of accusers in this thread, are you done making false accusations or do you feel the need for thebelittlingto continue? Apologies forth coming?:eek:

I haven't accused youof anything, that I'm aware of?

Had no comments on the contents of gas leases, only that some who signed them and got them back unsigned by the exploration companies, were upset they didn't get in on the big sacks of cash some of their neighbors did, while it lasted.

bawanajim 02-05-2009 09:21 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
Denny I did not mean to include you in that statement, I quoted some of the earlier accusers in an earlier post.They all seem to be unable to recall some the bold accusations of plagiarism that were made.

But you are right some of those whom were holding out for the big bucks in turn got nothing,all but those whom were paid upon signing or those whose sight excavation had begun are subject to paragraph 3 and chances are they will be released from contract.
Even though huge gas reserves are present over all cost,lack of funding And clean water disposal are all part of demise of ourshale exploratory drilling programs of today.
It is far from over it has slowed till calmer heads emerge,then proper drilling ,water disposaland product production will continue.

bawanajim 02-05-2009 10:05 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
I'mstill quite amazed at justhow much crowone blue bird would eat. [&:]
A man would think that before making unfunded accusation against another poster he would do a little research on the subject matter,and thenunderstand the ramifications of actions before making such a display of ignorance.

bawanajim 02-05-2009 10:37 AM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
Seems like the crow for dinnergot the best of him.[&:]

bawanajim, blkpowder, germain, DougE, Buck Hunter 1, frocb, pjarrows, ManySpurs, crokit, scarp262

bluebird2 02-05-2009 12:00 PM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
[quoteAre you gonna tell him where you got those big words soon Jim?

I'm thinking he simply didn't understand your posts. Anyone who has read at all about the marcellus shale gas should be able to spot your source in a New York Minute
][/quote]


Somebody is not telling the truth.

DennyF 02-05-2009 12:30 PM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
Both of the leases I received in the mail, included fullpayment up front for the lease termitself, once the lease was consumated.

Whatever happens now with them putting-off development, or waiting until the price of gas goes back up, would be reflected in royalty payments (if any), at the time gas is either extracted or isn't extracted.

Many of my camp neighbors were upset because they had their farms already leased at far lower premiums than were being offered last summer and fall. Two I know of, were lucky enough to have some land that the old leases had expired on, so got to cash in on the big money last year. One signed "too early", got $1500 per acre, the other got $2000 per acre on 80 acres, some of which adjoins me.

bowtruck 02-05-2009 01:10 PM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
in my area they were signing at 2500 last fall

DennyF 02-05-2009 01:29 PM

RE: Mohr needs to regroup
 
I was happy for the family that got $1500 per acre. That farm has been in their family since the early 1930s and they've worked their knuckles off on the place all those years, runninga dairy farm.

The other feller is a shifty littlerascal, gets along with hardly anyone around there, although he's always let me hunt onhis land. Sold him some of our hay last year, but told him he couldn't get the bales up next to the woods, until the ground hardened up some. Was only joking, but he waited until it froze again before bringing them off the hill.

His son killed his first buck on my property years ago when he was 13, now the kid is grown up and has done two tours in Iraq. Guess daddyrecalls his kid could hunt on us, so still returns the favor?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.