Since Steve Mohr (USPprez)is still insisting thatPGC and DCNR will be rolling in money fromMarcellus Shale gas money, guess this newswill not please him?

http://pittsburgh.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/stories/2009/01/19/story1.html?surround=etf&b=1232341200%5e176212 6

Does that mean you are happy that the PGC will be potentially receiving less revenue?

The unlikely welcome of a cash influx could possibly be offset by an increase of potential liability for cost overruns or unintentional waste watershed damage.Which clearly would be an unwelcome response to an other wise rapid dash for cash by anoperational break through in a forced funding dilemma.

The PGC would have no liability for cost over runs and the gas companies would be liable for any damages due to potential pollution ,which would mean more revenue for the pGC and DCNR.

Substantial financial capital could be endangered by unintentional subterranean structural damage done by responsible people incapable ofmeasuring the tables of filtration done by aquiferial water tables.
This damage would would be irreversible and substantial monetary retribution would be required by all involved.

Not if the contract was written properly. Who is going to sue the PGC for damage done to aquifers under SGLs?

The damagethough done in strategical location,is not limited to man made boundaries. Compete towns water systems could beimmediately affected with schools and hospitals being rendered useless.
Bonding in amounts needed to guarantee resources necessary to restore sanitary brine free aquiferial water systems not requiring reparations to end users is unavailable to serviceable industries in PA.

So are you saying the companies wasted all that money buying up the rights to drill?

Wow those are some big words there bawanajim.

He he he. I was thinking the same. Ive never heard --Losing money due to polluting ground water-- put so eloquently! (LOL)