|
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Res ipsa loquitur!!!
|
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
gotta say dont know much about the shale but i sure do like the names they keep me coming back to this topic
babblebird the most fitting ever |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Well, after 7 pages of mudslinging, name calling, and other playschool BS, I can honestly say that this was the most ridiculous thread I've ever seen, beginning with BWJ copying and pasting quotations from an unnamed source without assigning due credit to the original author which is undoubtedly plagiarism. Why not just paste the link and then state your own position on the issue? So in the midst of this BS, I just wasted approx ten minutes of mylimited break timereading a crock of crap and some name calling.
|
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
ORIGINAL: Screamin Steel Well, after 7 pages of mudslinging, name calling, and other playschool BS, I can honestly say that this was the most ridiculous thread I've ever seen, beginning with BWJ copying and pasting quotations from an unnamed source without assigning due credit to the original author which is undoubtedly plagiarism. Why not just paste the link and then state your own position on the issue? So in the midst of this BS, I just wasted approx ten minutes of mylimited break timereading a crock of crap and some name calling. |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Bluebird2 Isn't it funny that someone would copy and paste quotes from a report and claim it as his own words. I think that might be called plagiarism. coalcracker Someone else must be using his name, he couldn't even spell those wordsor even know what they mean. Bluebird2 All one has to do to know that was copied from a report is to look at the sentence structure. no one would reply in that manner to a post on a MB. [align=right][/align][align=right] ORIGINAL: Screamin Steel Well, after 7 pages of mudslinging, name calling, and other playschool BS, I can honestly say that this was the most ridiculous thread I've ever seen, beginning with BWJ copying and pasting quotations from an unnamed source without assigning due credit to the original author which is undoubtedly plagiarism. I stated my opinion on a subject that I have essentialknowledge of and in return I am blatantly accused of plagiarism. It is that yourinability to decipher knowledgenot only interferes with the defining of your own point , it precludes any worthy inception of another's point of view. All of the above post were written solely without assist by myself with knowledge gained through hands on work and studies in the field. I will swear to that on any mans bible. The accusatory post that lead to the demise of this thread point out how desperate a few are to destroy their opponent's character ,because without intellectual debate there are so few armed with the judicious knowledge required to even step on to thefield yet alone win in battle. |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
At least when Bluebabble posts about deer management, he does do some research to be able to use his twisted distortions but in this case, it's painfully obvious that he really has no clue what your posts mean this time, Jim. If he did, he would never have claimed plagarism because the source or your information would be obvious to anyone with even a remote degree of understanding on this particular issue.
This was purely a case of Bluebabble doing his best to strike up another flame war by making a false accusation. His ignorance of the topic showed itself immediately but he'll never admit to the fact that he has no clue as to what the whole theme of this thread is about. Just as unfortunate is the uninformed others who jumped of his bandwagon. I wonder if Babblebird's lemmings will ever realize he led them astray on this one? |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
He utilized a source that I was able to identify immediately. If you knew anything about it you'd have figured out where he got his information too. |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Maybe the little birdy finally realized he's out of his league here?
|
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Well, the bottom line hasn't changed, despite all the irrelevantbluster posted here.
Mohr and his colleagues have been badgering the legislature for monthsto "do something" about theirposition that the PGC doesn't deserve to keep any of the Marcellus Shale gas monies, all while claiming the leases/royalties will produce untold millions for the agency. Some of them have demanded that this money be confiscated for the state's General Fund, instead of being used by the game commission. The article supports what I have heard from some that live in the MS areas, about leases being returned unsigned by the exploration companiesand that things have changed since last summer and fall, due to the economy and the price of natural gas. |
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
ORIGINAL: DennyF Well, the bottom line hasn't changed, despite all the irrelevantbluster posted here. Mohr and his colleagues have been badgering the legislature for monthsto "do something" about theirposition that the PGC doesn't deserve to keep any of the Marcellus Shale gas monies, all while claiming the leases/royalties will produce untold millions for the agency. Some of them have demanded that this money be confiscated for the state's General Fund, instead of being used by the game commission. The article supports what I have heard from some that live in the MS areas, about leases being returned unsigned by the exploration companiesand that things have changed since last summer and fall, due to the economy and the price of natural gas. I have yet to receive any satisfaction from the vocal minority of accusers in this thread, are you done making false accusations or do you feel the need for thebelittlingto continue? Apologies forth coming?:eek: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.