HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   How should Wildlife Management be funded? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/284560-how-should-wildlife-management-funded.html)

germain 02-04-2009 11:48 AM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
You guys are funny.:DMany of us are very passionate about deer hunting so nerves do get rattled and tempers flare.But being both yinz are hunters you would probably do just fine drinking a beer together.As rodney king once said,"can't we all just get along?":D

Cornelius08 02-04-2009 11:52 AM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 


germain 02-04-2009 11:58 AM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
Welp I guess that didn't work.:D

Cornelius08 02-04-2009 12:02 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
I LIke btb. He's like huningnets own private little court jester.:D Hes like one of those little cartoon jesters that tell jokes and arent funny when they try to be, but hilarious when he goes to take a step and falls on his face. (LOL)(LOL)



germain 02-04-2009 12:20 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
I really don't want to get in this but even though I disagree with BT at times he seems like a hell of a nice guy.

Cornelius08 02-04-2009 12:34 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
Im not upset with him. Just having a little fun at his expense. He should only expect it after accusing me falsely. If the roles had been reversed, he'd have been more than happy to let me know about it! (LOL);)

bluebird2 02-04-2009 01:42 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 

No buck the buck kill didn't invrease by 40% in 2F.They wanted the herd stabilized and that 40% increase clearly showed the herd was starting to rebound.It doesn't mean that they're managing them to any long term difference.Hunters screamed and the PGC tried to stabilize almost every WMU.
When the PGC said the herd in 2G increased by 40% in 2006 in 2G I said they were crazy and that the increase in the buck harvest was due to the below average harvest in 2005. But, the PGC increased the doe tags from 19K in 2006 to 29K in 2007. Well guess what, the PGC revised the 2006 increase from 40% down to 6%, but the increased tags reduced the 2007 OWDD by 23% from 2006.

So we can all forget about scientific deer management based on herd health and forest health!!!!!

DougE 02-04-2009 01:47 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
They never claimed the herd increased by 40%.However,when the harvest increased by that much,it's a strong indication that the herd did in fact increase.Since the goal was stabilization,they bumped the tags up a little.

bowtruck 02-04-2009 01:47 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 
you sure know your stuff bb and you are right as usual :eek:[:o]

bluebird2 02-04-2009 01:53 PM

RE: How should Wildlife Management be funded?
 


ORIGINAL: DougE

They never claimed the herd increased by 40%.However,when the harvest increased by that much,it's a strong indication that the herd did in fact increase.Since the goal was stabilization,they bumped the tags up a little.
Once again you are flat out wrong. The 2006 AWR showed that the DD increased by 40% from 2005 to 2006.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.