![]() |
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
To get back on the topic of this thread, it looks like at least one part ofour management plan is a big success if we measure it by hunter satisfaction.
|
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
Simply showing that some areas had more samples than others is meaningless in this context unless we know what the numbers were before and after by WMU. If one WMU has twice as many samples as another but used to have three times as many, that could produce significant changes. We simply cant tell that from what you've presented since the older data is by county and the new data is by WMU. Again, apples and oranges. The simple fact is neither you or RSB can provide a logical explanation for why breeding rates decreased , but I have shown conclusively it was not due to a shift in sample sizes and locations. |
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
All you have shown conclusively is that you are willing to repeat yourself over and over even though you can't back up your claim. If you have any real documentation, please post it. Otherwise, those of us who can read know who is making unsupported claims here. I'm not gonna play did not did to with you!
I think it's now appropriate to drag this old nag out again..... |
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
I provided the data to support my position and all you provided is a bogus example using bogus numbers and pictures of dead horses.
At least RSB was smart enough to drop out of this debate so he wouldn't have to admit he was wrong and you should have followed his example. |
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
BB2: Moderators were just kidding when they said an award will be given to whomever makes the most posts in a 30 day period.
|
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
That's pretty funny since I just won third prize in a contest on another message board where the number of entries were based on the number of posts each MB member made during a specified period. i'm looking forward to receiving my new ML and game calls in the near future.
|
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
oh boy
|
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
No, BTB says it is Blueboy or that other word he uses a lot.
|
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 I provided the data to support my position and all you provided is a bogus example using bogus numbers and pictures of dead horses. At least RSB was smart enough to drop out of this debate so he wouldn't have to admit he was wrong and you should have followed his example. I haven’t dropped out at all. I have provided the correct answer and as has been pointed out several times all you have done is post an outlandish example where it proved you had posted data that was both wrong and misleading. Now you post data that is, as BTBowhunter pointed out, is an apples to oranges comparison and expect people to just accept your analogy of it. I would certainly hope not. Once the law suit you and your buddies are trying to float are a thing of the past I suspect additional data on this topic will be forthcoming. The fact is you really don’t even know which areas of the state really influence the sample sizes today compared to the past let alone which had or have the highest or lowest breeding rates. You simply make far to many assumptions about way too many things of which you know very little about, and that is about all I can say on the topic for the time being. But, no matter how you look at it the antler restrictions are here to stay and gaining in hunter support so the buck/doe ratios are probably going to stay relatively stable and might even further improve in the future. As for the deer populations I am sure they are going to continue with their up and down trends to match the environmental conditions, both good and bad. I am also sure that no matter how high they would get there would still be hunters complaining that there were not deer. I am also sure that the professionals will continue to do the very best job possible to manage our resources for the best possible benefit of the future in spite of all of the detractors like you and the rest of the Uninformed Silly People or your law suits. We will continue to educate those that can be educated the same as we will continue to expose those that promote misguided agendas and missions intending to undermine sound scientific management of our resources. We will do that as a commitment to the future and the best possible hunting for today and tomorrow. So, you can bet that I am not dropping out until I also drop over never to rise again. R.S. Bodenhorn |
RE: Pa Antler Restrictions
I'll have to get the link to the N.Y. report of A/R, they tell it like it is with no spin at all.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.