Well put up or shut up.Post something that proves the results from Miss. are BS. I can say everything you and BTB posts are BS and you can say the same about me and that accomplishes nothing. Show us what you got hotshot.

already did and you dimised it in 10 seconds when there was 11 links there
you are a waste of time and will not get reply after reply blueb

You presented nothing but your opinions. You don't know squat about Miss. and you don't understand the kroll study or the study on which the Newsweek article was based.

Now tell us exactly why a statewide study based on harvest data in Miss. is flawed. You can't do it because you don't understand the effects of high grading or the long term genetics effects of ARs on the gene pool.

I disagree. Only an anti hunter would relentlessly continue to post the distortions you post on a hunting message board. You did a fair job of diguising youself as a hunter until you exposed yourself by posting a blatant anti hunting article and continued to defend it to make a point.

Oh, and your latest alias "Bluebird" sounds more like a PETA nickname than that of a hunter!

If I was anti-hunting ,a great white trophy hunter like you would have posted all sorts of data and links to prove I was a fraud. As yet you have posted nothing to contradict what I have posted so maybe you are the fraud who can't support his position with facts. Harris is a recognized expert in the field of wildlife research and you are an absolute nobody who can only support his position with name calling and cheap shots.

BTW, what do you have against bluebirds? I build nesting boxes for them and enjoy seeing them around. do you hate blue birds as much as you hate me?

By fraud could you mean using as many as5 differentaliases?

No links necessary, you've now admitted to that.

I don't hate either real bluebirds oranti hunters posing as hunters and usingcutewild bird handles as their screen name. Sorry to disappoint you.You aren't important enough to hate

I see your new tactic is to say anything to avoid discussing the contents of the Harris study. But, that's okay because ARs will fail because they are a flawed method for increasing the buck age structure. ARs would be repealed even sooner if the PGC wasn't with holding the data on the current rack sizes of 2.5+ buck.

bb how do you explain people seeing more big bucks
i have heard of alot a people who shot a nice 8 that
had never got the oppertunity before

Some people are seeing more big buck and some are seeing less. Some just think they are seeing more big buck since they are seeing a lot fewer small buck due to HR.Naturally in the 4 pt. areas you'll see a lot of nice buck harvested since the average buck will have at least 7 or 8 pts,except for the one antlered buck.

Talked yourself into a circle there Blueboy.
Just a little while back you claimed the people who were seeing more bucks were merelyseeing small inferior bucks saved by AR


Oh and I notice you had no answer when Jim pointed out the conclusions of the study that you and your anti hunting hero Lily Huang chose to leave out.

I will give youcredit for brilliance in one area Blueboy, You have an uncanny ability to take little pieces of truth so that you can
assemble a lie