![]() |
RE: Ar's= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 I don't evaluate ARs based on your success, my lack of success or the success of any individual hunter. I base it on breeding rates productivity the number of 2.5+ buck harvested and the percentage of 3.5 and 4.5 buck in the harvest. If you choose to judge the statewide plan based on your success that's fine with me!! However, I think it provides a very limited and biased opinion. The only thing that I see bias andlimiting is your ability to reason.[:-] |
RE: Ar's= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Yet you base your dissatisfaction on a anti hunting story written in "news Week" magazine and your admitted ineptness at killing legal bucks. |
RE: Ar's= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Yet you base your dissatisfaction on a anti hunting story written in "news Week" magazine and your admitted ineptness at killing legal bucks. I figured as much. :eek: |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 I don't evaluate ARs based on your success, my lack of success or the success of any individual hunter. I base it on breeding rates productivity the number of 2.5+ buck harvested and the percentage of 3.5 and 4.5 buck in the harvest. If you choose to judge the statewide plan based on your success that's fine with me!! However, I think it provides a very limited and biased opinion. Looks like you were actually right about something Blueboy! |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Apparently you forgot I passes on 5 AR legal buck in 2003 and was within 25-30 yds . of a nice 8 pt. this year.
My opposition to ARs is that it was sold based on lies and the fact that it was not needed and it is the worst possible choice for improving the age structure. |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Apparently you forgot I passes on 5 AR legal buck in 2003 and was within 25-30 yds . of a nice 8 pt. this year. My opposition to ARs is that it was sold based on lies and the fact that it was not needed and it is the worst possible choice for improving the age structure. ![]() |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Apparently you forgot I passes on 5 AR legal buck in 2003 and was within 25-30 yds . of a nice 8 pt. this year. ![]() |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bawanajim ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Apparently you forgot I passes on 5 AR legal buck in 2003 and was within 25-30 yds . of a nice 8 pt. this year.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jimbo, that was a good one! you made my day:D |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Passed a legal buck my hiney.
He chastises us as elitists when we do that. |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
I've been that close to Sharon Stone too, and I'll bet I came closer to scoring than you did. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.