ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
01-09-2009 | 04:56 PM
#101
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
The big 5.5 was Illinois, the buck on his right is a PA 3.5. The second 5.5 was PA last year.
Found every one of em on all four feet
and then killed em with an arrow.
All were aged by the lower jawbone
Found every one of em on all four feet
and then killed em with an arrow. All were aged by the lower jawbone
01-09-2009 | 05:01 PM
#103
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
The big 5.5 was Illinois, the buck on his right is a PA 3.5. The second 5.5 was PA last year.
Found every one of em on all four feet and then killed em with an arrow.
All were aged by the lower jawbone
The big 5.5 was Illinois, the buck on his right is a PA 3.5. The second 5.5 was PA last year.
Found every one of em on all four feet
and then killed em with an arrow. All were aged by the lower jawbone
01-09-2009 | 05:04 PM
#105
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
All were aged by the lower jawbone
01-09-2009 | 05:09 PM
#106
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: petropedro
again,tell us you never seen antlers like that before ar while spotting.
again,tell us you never seen antlers like that before ar while spotting.
01-09-2009 | 05:17 PM
#107
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
The 5.5 spindly buck you harvested must have been an inferior 1.5 spike since it lacks the mass of a normal 5.5 buck. i am really surprise you would have harvested such an inferior buck after ARs were implemented.
01-09-2009 | 05:19 PM
#108
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
What method was used to judge the age of each buck. Simply referring to the lower jaw bone tells us nothing about the aging method.
All were aged by the lower jawbone
Forgive me, I incorrectly assumed that you would understand the process. In case you ever harvest something over 6 months old these might come in handy. The system isn't perfect but it's reasonably accurate.
http://www.uwrf.edu/biology/electives_dir/wildlife_dir/aging_wtd_tooth_wear.pdf
http://www.timberwolfinformation.org/info/deerjaw/ages.htm
http://mdc.mo.gov/hunt/deer/age/
01-09-2009 | 05:20 PM
#109
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Ha ha ha. Nice to accept crap and pgc mismanagement when you have a good spot in Illinois to ahem..."hunt". (LOL)
My lil' 7 year old nephew could kill a decent buck in Illinois! (LOL)(LOL)
My lil' 7 year old nephew could kill a decent buck in Illinois! (LOL)(LOL)
01-09-2009 | 05:20 PM
#110
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
The 5.5 spindly buck you harvested must have been an inferior 1.5 spike since it lacks the mass of a normal 5.5 buck. i am really surprise you would have harvested such an inferior buck after ARs were implemented.
The 5.5 spindly buck you harvested must have been an inferior 1.5 spike since it lacks the mass of a normal 5.5 buck. i am really surprise you would have harvested such an inferior buck after ARs were implemented.