Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
01-10-2009 | 10:25 AM
#101
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
I havn't met BTBowhunter but between this thread and the antler restriction thread I can tell he is my kind of person!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
01-10-2009 | 10:35 AM
#102
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: tsoc
I havn't met BTBowhunter but between this thread and the antler restriction thread I can tell he is my kind of person!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
I havn't met BTBowhunter but between this thread and the antler restriction thread I can tell he is my kind of person!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
01-10-2009 | 11:56 AM
#103
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
a friend said that fishers was introduced by the trappers request. they pay their own trap license fee as archery hunters pay their members only fee. not sure how true this is,but seems logical and we have no right to complain then if they are paying for it. but the draw back is the game animals we hunt are now prey for another predator. so maybe they shouldn't been introduced and are actually costing us huntersour game animals.
01-10-2009 | 01:23 PM
#104
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: tsoc
I havn't met BTBowhunter but between this thread and the antler restriction thread I can tell he is my kind of person!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
I havn't met BTBowhunter but between this thread and the antler restriction thread I can tell he is my kind of person!
I commend your defense of your positions and your responses to these self annointed experts!
01-10-2009 | 01:56 PM
#107
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
No, I have consistently said spikes are inferior for the rate of antler development and there is no evidence that it is not due to being genetically inferior.
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
My screen name is Bluebird ,not Bluejob BS and you know exactly what he was implying.
Here's another example.
Pedro, Blueboy
01-10-2009 | 02:01 PM
#108
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
what would you call this.
My screen name is Bluebird ,not Bluejob BS and you know exactly what he was implying.
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
No, I have consistently said spikes are inferior for the rate of antler development and there is no evidence that it is not due to being genetically inferior.
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
My screen name is Bluebird ,not Bluejob BS and you know exactly what he was implying.
01-10-2009 | 02:05 PM
#110
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: petropedro
a friend said that fishers was introduced by the trappers request. they pay their own trap license fee as archery hunters pay their members only fee. not sure how true this is,but seems logical and we have no right to complain then if they are paying for it. but the draw back is the game animals we hunt are now prey for another predator. so maybe they shouldn't been introduced and are actually costing us huntersour game animals.
a friend said that fishers was introduced by the trappers request. they pay their own trap license fee as archery hunters pay their members only fee. not sure how true this is,but seems logical and we have no right to complain then if they are paying for it. but the draw back is the game animals we hunt are now prey for another predator. so maybe they shouldn't been introduced and are actually costing us huntersour game animals.
not only deer but rabbits, grouse,turkeys too.
the biggest predator of fawns i see and feel now is COYOTE.
penn state says BEARS too
