![]() |
RE: PA deer Quizz
The term,"per capita" includes the entire population of the state, not just hunters.
In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. Ol Jimbob didn't get to shoot his forky this year....WAAAAHHHH the world is going to end. Maybe having tougher hunting will cause people to actually have to HUNT for deer. Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Maybe having tougher hunting will cause people to actually have to HUNT for deer. Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Can you give us the success rate for bow hunters?
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 The term,"per capita" includes the entire population of the state, not just hunters. In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. Well, no. The term per capita is a Latin phrase meaning "per head" or for the more simple minded..."per hunter". When relating to per capita, the term would be applied only to parties of interest to the subject. You would not include golfers in the equation, as an example. Actually, your figures are skewed. The harvest in 2000 was before concurrent seasons. So anyone out hunting would not stop unless they hunted their allotment of usual days, or they shot a buck. In 2005 we had concurrent seasons where a certain percentage of hunters shot the first DEER that came along, and then were not permitted to harvest another that day. A high percentage of hunters do not return after the first day. There would then be a disproportionate number of hunters on subsequent days of the season, because there is more participation on day one than all that follow. You are comparing the proverbial apples and Oranges in your figures. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Isn't that exactly what the vast majority of bow hunters do every year? I hope this clears up many of your misconceptions about archery hunting Bird.. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Bluebird please don't misconstrue Dr. Demarais' teachings. There comes a point in time when antler restrictions do result in highgrading, but that is under relatively perfect conditions. Pennsylvania and New York are nowhere near those perfect conditions. The buck to doe ratio would have to be 3 to 1 or better, habitat & nutrition conditions pristine and several years of antler restrictions would have to have been in place to be at a highgrading level. Then and only then do you change the methodology of the management plan taking into account actual deer aging, antler mass andwidth and include culling as part of the harvesting plan (as they do in places like Texas).
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
It is more likely to get many more hunters to quit hunting ,which has been the trend under the current deer management plan. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Let's take up a collection.
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
The buck to doe ratio would have to be 3 to 1 or better, habitat & nutrition conditions pristine and several years of antler restrictions would have to have been in place to be at a highgrading level. Then and only then do you change the methodology of the management plan taking into account actual deer aging, antler mass and width and include culling as part of the harvesting plan (as they do in places like Texas). Your post is quite interesting since I have never seen the criteria you posted associated with high grading. Can you provide a link to the sorce of that info? High grading occurred after just 4 years of ARs in Miss and it occurred across all soil types . When high grading occurred in Miss. the habitat was not pristine. Our B/D ratio in PA before ARs was 1:2 and the herd was at or below the MSY carrying capacity, so I suppose PA met your criteria for high grading. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.