NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
12-11-2005, 01:22 PM
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lee , New Hampshire
Posts: 312
NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
Read this today in our NH "Hawkeye" paper and could not believe what I was reading.. It said Princeton NJ residents saw fawns bouncing around this past june and were not to happy >>> They wanted to know what went wrong because they hired Anthony DiNicola president of White Buffalo Inc...and get this.. the most well known deer sharpshooter in the country..Sorry all other sharpshooters don't count. Anyway Anthony collected $500 smackers per deer he shot with the birth control vaccine "SPAY VAC". But obviously the deer still had "little ones". As a result at press time Spay Vac had been shelved for more testing!
I must say good for you Anthony on the 500 per shot.. To bad these residents don't do some home work and let hunters (bow or otherwise) help manage their herd after all it's you & me that keep pouring dollars into Conservation.
FYI Hunters Contributions for Conservation now surpass $700 MILLION ANNUALY ($703,794,135.00) copy of report is available at http://federalasst.fws.gov.
I must say good for you Anthony on the 500 per shot.. To bad these residents don't do some home work and let hunters (bow or otherwise) help manage their herd after all it's you & me that keep pouring dollars into Conservation.
FYI Hunters Contributions for Conservation now surpass $700 MILLION ANNUALY ($703,794,135.00) copy of report is available at http://federalasst.fws.gov.
12-12-2005, 10:16 AM
#2
Dominant Buck
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,545
RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
Antis drive a lot of this mentality , and they'll never believe that hunting is a solution .
When you consider the birth rate of whitetails even if you had a contraceptive that actually works it would never be more cost effective , or as effective period , as a hunter shooting the same deer . Remember , these are the same kind of folks who hired Mr. DiNicola to sharpshoot a bunch of deer around Princton recently . Hunting that pays for itself is bad , but sharpshooting or ineffective darting that costs a fortune is good ?
When you consider the birth rate of whitetails even if you had a contraceptive that actually works it would never be more cost effective , or as effective period , as a hunter shooting the same deer . Remember , these are the same kind of folks who hired Mr. DiNicola to sharpshoot a bunch of deer around Princton recently . Hunting that pays for itself is bad , but sharpshooting or ineffective darting that costs a fortune is good ?
12-12-2005, 04:32 PM
#4
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: the woods of NJ.
Posts: 5,643
RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
If the townslet the hunters do the culling they would atleast benifit monetary wise as far as gas,lodging, licenses, restaraunts etc, Instead the taxpayers are footing the bill.
