broad head
02-26-2008 | 12:58 PM
#21
Boone & Crockett
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,563
Likes: 0
From: Burleson Texas
RE: broad head
ORIGINAL: RLoving1
Is that what you shot that deer with last year? All most of us need for deer size game is the 100-125 weight range isn't it?
ORIGINAL: The Rev
I agree, my all time favorite is Muzzy Phantom 220 grain broadhead. It's akiller!
ORIGINAL: burniegoeasily
Mechanicals will work, but a fixed cut on contact work so much better. Ive lost hogs using mechanical, I have yet to lose one with fixed heads. And im talking about lots of hog, not just a few.
My favorits and depending on bow and kind of bow are. Slick tricks, Muzzy three blades, stinger, and Monotec G 5. There are many good heads, these are just the ones ive used and like.
Mechanicals will work, but a fixed cut on contact work so much better. Ive lost hogs using mechanical, I have yet to lose one with fixed heads. And im talking about lots of hog, not just a few.
My favorits and depending on bow and kind of bow are. Slick tricks, Muzzy three blades, stinger, and Monotec G 5. There are many good heads, these are just the ones ive used and like.
02-26-2008 | 01:44 PM
#22
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 26,274
Likes: 0
From: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
RE: broad head
Wow, 220 grain. I dont go past 120 with any of my compound bows.I dogo higher with trad bows so I can get the right spine. I bet it did put the smack down on that deer.
02-26-2008 | 04:20 PM
#23
Boone & Crockett
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,563
Likes: 0
From: Burleson Texas
RE: broad head
Yep, I shoot a 543 grains at 21 % FOC. Hits like a javelin. We designed them for hogs, but if an occasional deer happens to cross my path, dead deer walking!
Think about it, if it works on trad. it will on compound. Forl years trad shooters have gone with heavy FOC and it's worked so the same thought behind this. I did have to go to 340 spine so I wouldn't be under spined. I usually shoot a 400 spine arrow, at 58#.
Think about it, if it works on trad. it will on compound. Forl years trad shooters have gone with heavy FOC and it's worked so the same thought behind this. I did have to go to 340 spine so I wouldn't be under spined. I usually shoot a 400 spine arrow, at 58#.
02-26-2008 | 05:15 PM
#25
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From:
RE: broad head
I think that "Daddy Russ" is going to help me figure out something in the 400 spine with 125 gr head,I figure that should work with my 60 d/w,I also like the looks of the 3 blade muzzy,the 2 blades seem like a airplane with no pilot...who's gonna steer it?
02-26-2008 | 07:29 PM
#26
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 0
From: Burleson TX USA
RE: broad head
the 2 blades seem like a airplane with no pilot...who's gonna steer it?
Thats what the fletching is for.
Stick to what you know best.
Doing those Travelocity commercials
02-27-2008 | 10:54 AM
#30
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 26,274
Likes: 0
From: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
RE: broad head
ORIGINAL: The Rev
Yep, I shoot a 543 grains at 21 % FOC. Hits like a javelin. We designed them for hogs, but if an occasional deer happens to cross my path, dead deer walking!
Think about it, if it works on trad. it will on compound. Forl years trad shooters have gone with heavy FOC and it's worked so the same thought behind this. I did have to go to 340 spine so I wouldn't be under spined. I usually shoot a 400 spine arrow, at 58#.
Yep, I shoot a 543 grains at 21 % FOC. Hits like a javelin. We designed them for hogs, but if an occasional deer happens to cross my path, dead deer walking!
Think about it, if it works on trad. it will on compound. Forl years trad shooters have gone with heavy FOC and it's worked so the same thought behind this. I did have to go to 340 spine so I wouldn't be under spined. I usually shoot a 400 spine arrow, at 58#.
But you are right, works for trad bows so why not.