Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Rethinking the rifle >

Rethinking the rifle

Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Rethinking the rifle

Old 03-02-2002, 12:33 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Briman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Body in SE WI, mind in U.P.
Posts: 4,781
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

I wonder if a ceramic bore liner would work?
If you had a bore that was made out of an extremely hard, smooth ceramic material, accuracy should improve. The rifling would never wear out and due to the heat resistant nature or ceramics, the throat should never erode making a gun last virtually forever.
Briman is offline  
Old 03-02-2002, 08:20 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Meridian MS
Posts: 337
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

I think the limit has pretty much been reached with smokeless powder. Maybe in the future we'll see some kind of rifle where you'll just stick a bullet in there and the propellant will be injected through the breech? Maybe gyro stabilized sighting systems and no more rifling, instead saboted bullets like the projectiles out of the M1 tank gun. Zero lock time ignitions like are coming about with the electric ignition guns. All in all I think the biggest advances are to be had by increasing velocity to 3-4 times current levels by some alternative propellant, lightweight alloy saboted bullets, and smoothbores. Imagine the kinetic energy of a 50 grain tungsten projectile at 12000 fps that has a ballistic coefficient around 3.0. Essentially you'd be shooting a needle with greater energy than a .375 H&H and virtually no drop over the ranges you can see a game animal. Of course, if you hit a deer with that thing you'd probably splatter parts all over the hillside.

I tend to agree with the others, I'm satisfied with the bolt action rifle in it's current incarnation, but it's fun to wonder what might happen.
boltman is offline  
Old 03-02-2002, 10:43 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

I am no engineer or riflesmith, but I am fascinated with guns and weapons. For a military style weapon or one where you need to have reduced muzzle jump, why couldn't you build one with the barrel and action suspended below the handgrips? Imagine a Thompson gun turned upside down with two pistol grips above the barrel. Biomechanically, aren't the muscles in our arms/shoulders/backs stronger when we are pushing down rather than trying to pull down?

With an electronic ignition system, it wouldn't matter where the trigger was located.

The Mouse
The Mouse is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 06:35 PM
  #14  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: KUNKLETOWN PA United States
Posts: 872
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

the only thing i'de change is makeing them all full custom rifles ( better factory tuneing and handwork done on the reciever and bolt,better target quality triggers, better stock fit and finish,better quality on barrels such as muzzle crowning and other acurracy enhancements.) and all of that for an economy model price
whelen36 is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 07:06 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Minneola, Central Florida, USA
Posts: 246
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

Hey, I like the idea of different bore linings. Chrome lining was a good first step. How about Teflon jackets on bullets? 100 times better than molly.

Also, I have contemplated moving the barrel down under the ammunition source to lower the thrust angle and keep the barrel down under auto fire. Safety might suffer, but I was thinking more of a balanced system where the muzzle would neither sink or rise.

I guess the secret to low diameter, high cross sectional density rounds (needles in sabots) is keeping them spinning (they have low angular momentum) and making sure they expand on impact.

Powder needs another quantum leap. Higher density of power would make cartridges much smaller, if not much lighter. But, some wahoo would load a 30-06 with it and blow themselves to kingdom come.

Airguns have been making big technical strides. How about a chemical reaction in the stock that would generate a high-pressure gas to launch a bullet?

Just noodling things through.

Chubber
Chubber is offline  
Old 03-04-2002, 07:31 AM
  #16  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pawhuska OK USA
Posts: 94
Default RE: Rethinking the rifle

rail gun? 3miles per second?
eyeballjr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CharlieNY
Muzzleloading Guns
11
12-02-2012 12:45 PM
songkewei
Optics
4
06-16-2009 07:35 AM
songkewei
Wanted
3
06-16-2009 03:44 AM
muliehuner
Swap-A-Hunt
0
11-20-2007 04:54 PM
GMMAT
Bowhunting
30
09-18-2006 06:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: Rethinking the rifle


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.