Ruger #1 quarter rib base for scope
#2

ORIGINAL: biscuit jake Is there a better after market base, or leave well enough alone? Thanks
#3
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471

look at www.scopemounts.com they offer a base that extends towards the shooters eye. You have to use their rings however
#5

I have to send my Ruger 1 back to the factory. The base was installed incorrectly and off-line. I cannot get a scope to zero on it as scope won't adjust right enough. [:@][:'(]
#6

I can see where this could happen, but they should have causgth this in QC inspection!!! My No. 1's have all shot well.

Two 100-yard No. 1 groups - one with the .45/70, one with the 1A 7X57mm..

Two 100-yard No. 1 groups - one with the .45/70, one with the 1A 7X57mm..
#7

The base is off by about 1/8 of an inch. Doesn't sound like much til you put a scope that has little horizontal leeway. I never noticed it. My gunsmith is going to put a type of ring on that has a windage adjust, instead of sending it back to factory.
#8
Spike
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5

I have a Ruger #1 stainless in 25-06. The rings, when installed on the factory base, don't even come close to allign up. It's not even close. There is NO WAY that I am going to put my brand new Leupold on it. I wonder if this is something that is covered under a lifetime warranty, as I purchased the rifle used. I cleaned the rings and base meticulously, so this is not the problem.
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970

I've used the quarter ribs with pretty good success. However, there have been some reported issues with misaligned ribs or even flexing. On my current #1B (Lam./ SS .300 Win Mag) I removed the quarter rib and got a zero degree pic rail made up from Richard Near. With my big scope mounted up, it is rock solid. I realize some would cry foul for going that route but I think it looks good (actually).