Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Anyone hunt with an AR-15? >

Anyone hunt with an AR-15?

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Anyone hunt with an AR-15?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:26 AM
  #21  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,681
Default

Originally Posted by MudderChuck
The best shot is when the Deer is relaxed, head down feeding, mostly standing sideways to you. I would take that shot with most any center fire rifle, you don't always get that shot. then you let it walk

I've had them bolt from the slightest sound, your rifle touching a wooden rest or railing, a zipper rubbing together. If they bolt right when you shoot, bad things happen.not the guns fault, you muffed the opportunity

Twigs or a little grass between you and the Deer. That bullet hits an object, even a tiny one, between you and your target, bad things happen.again a no shot situation

The Deer is looking at the rifle and sees the flash. There is something called a withdrawal reflex, it can put an animal in motion before the signal gets processed by the brain. In that fraction of a second it takes the bullet to get from the muzzle to the target, a Deer can be in motion. It only takes a small motion to make a good shot a bad shot.this is really picking at a bare bleached bone

What I'm saying is it isn't all on the marksman, some of it is just luck. If a shot does go slightly wrong, a larger caliber may be the difference between a quick kill and a lingering kill.a gut shot or a broken leg is about the same regardless of caliber

The last long shot I took was right through the ten ring (exactly where I wanted the bullet to go) shooting down hill at 350 yards. I consider myself a passable marksman. My first choice for large game wouldn't be a .223 if I had another option.never said it was best but it is definitely adequate

Maybe I'm just over sensitive to wounding an animal. The guys that own the lease next to mine shoot at anything that moves and aren't very good at it. Weekend warriors, who drink before they hunt, have somebody else gut their kill if they get lucky and leave a lot of wounded game to flee onto my lease. I've tracked down a lot of their mistakes. The guy next door always wants to argue with me about giving the Deer or hog back, I always laugh at him. I always welcome their donations, it doesn't count on my limit, it counts on their limit (by law here). As a matter of fact, I was the go to guy for tracking wounded game on three leases (and crossovers form neighboring leases), so maybe my perspective is skewed and it seems to me it happens a lot more than it actually does. Say ten to twelve Deer or Hogs a year average, over a 35 year period, adds up to a lot of meat.
and all those guys use a 223, what you describe is not because of any fault of the cartridge or caliber is it? blaming a rifle cartridge for careless and improper shooting of game will not change the opinions of folks who know how to use them. the 223 will make the same energy as a 30/30, with a good deer bullet it will penetrate as well, do you also condemn the use of the 30-30 for a deer cartridge?
RR
Ridge Runner is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 06:45 AM
  #22  
Nontypical Buck
 
MudderChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Germany/Calif.
Posts: 2,664
Default

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
and all those guys use a 223, what you describe is not because of any fault of the cartridge or caliber is it? blaming a rifle cartridge for careless and improper shooting of game will not change the opinions of folks who know how to use them. the 223 will make the same energy as a 30/30, with a good deer bullet it will penetrate as well, do you also condemn the use of the 30-30 for a deer cartridge?
RR
You are going to have to explain to me how "maybe not the best tool for the job", morphed into condemnation?

I actually think you agree with me and are just trying to argue it to death.

I think a .223 is not the optimum caliber for large game.

Just one example of many would be a wounded hog. Hogs can be tough to put down even under ideal situations. The smaller the hole, the greater the chance the wound is going to close and stop bleeding. No blood trail and finding that hog is going to be tough to impossible.

I've seen guys throw a wild round, sitting at the shooting bench, with a sandbag rest. I guess that qualifies as careless and improper?

In real life it only takes a small mistake to cause a bad shot. You can likely demolish a wall with a tack hammer, a sledge hammer would likely work better. IMO you can mitigate the mistakes somewhat, by using a bigger hammer.

I guess you are saying we can discontinue all those other rifles and ammunition types, because all we really need is an AR 15 in .223? Just kidding.
MudderChuck is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 07:39 AM
  #23  
Boone & Crockett
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 15,546
Default

Lets put this thread in context. The OP is not a hunter, he has an AR 15 and is thinking about hunting. A person who has never hunted big game and wants to use a less than optimal firearm is a different animal than a very experienced hunter who is an expert shot with various calibers and has no self doubt that he can make the shot count. I would advise a new hunter to use a larger caliber than .223 for big game.
Oldtimr is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 08:40 AM
  #24  
Nontypical Buck
 
super_hunt54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
Default

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
my thoughts
I've taken well over 100 deer with a 223, most of them were with standard soft points back in the day before there were deer bullets for them.
any bullet put into the lungs of a whitetail will kill it correct?
so the difference in using a 22 and a larger bullet comes down to having the patience and discipline to take the shot that will avoid the shoulder bone and hit the lungs, its not something the easily excitable hunter should do but it works, and works well.

If you can't hit a deers vitals with a 223, a bigger gun makes it easier? It would make up somewhat for poor shot placement, but who's gonna openly admit I don't shoot well under pressure so I carry the minimum of a 30 cal.
RR
And right there highlighted in red is the reason a .223 is NOT a good choice for whitetail. Any rifle cartridge that you have to AVOID hitting shoulder is simply too damn light. Plain and simple. When using rifle, my favorite shot IS high shoulder. When spot on perfect, takes out the spine and lungs and no trailing needed. If off by a tiny bit, still takes out lungs and a short trailing job usually. And since I have used a decent caliber that will pass through, I will have 2 holes with one being near twice starting caliber size or more. As well as more than likely 2 busted up shoulder blades slowing that animals flee.

Just because someone CAN use it and use it well does not in any way mean someone else should.
super_hunt54 is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 11:58 AM
  #25  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,681
Default

my posts are based on cartridge performance as I know it, ability, patience, woodsmanship and common sense are not possessed by everyone equally.
as far as staying off the shoulder, its common practice to do it with many cartridges to cut down on shot up meat, any 140 gr cup/core bullet from my 7mmSTW place midshoulder on a whitetail at less than 150 yds. will end with an exit hole you can throw a cat through.
why would any hunter intensionally blow both shoulders off of edible game?

BTW chuck, whitetails are considered light, thinned skinned, medium game.
RR

Last edited by Ridge Runner; 05-30-2015 at 12:03 PM.
Ridge Runner is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 12:19 PM
  #26  
Nontypical Buck
 
super_hunt54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
Default

Yeah, It's why I'm a huge fan of big and slow most of the time. Less meat destruction on it's way through the shoulders and spine. Since most of my Whitetail hunting has been limited to here in Illinois the past couple of years I have reacquainted myself with muzzleloadeing. Damn 12g slug gun is murder on the shoulder even with the limb saver tech in the stock. With high shoulder and big and slow, you aren't really taking much meat out and you are dropping the deer fast and easily. Gotta love DRT! Especially when you make Methusalah look like a kid! Couple pounds of meat verses trailing, I'll take the couple pounds of meat for 5 Sir!

Last edited by super_hunt54; 05-30-2015 at 12:22 PM.
super_hunt54 is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 12:32 PM
  #27  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Default

Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
my posts are based on cartridge performance as I know it, ability, patience, woodsmanship and common sense are not possessed by everyone equally.
as far as staying off the shoulder, its common practice to do it with many cartridges to cut down on shot up meat, any 140 gr cup/core bullet from my 7mmSTW place midshoulder on a whitetail at less than 150 yds. will end with an exit hole you can throw a cat through.
why would any hunter intensionally blow both shoulders off of edible game?

BTW chuck, whitetails are considered light, thinned skinned, medium game.
RR
Agree 100% with you RR! I can't think of a single deer of the many I've shot where I've aimed for the shoulder and the only time I might is if I see a big mulie in the high country this Fall on my upcoming horseback hunt. It will be a once in a lifetime hunt and if I get a shot at a big buck that may well be where I try to put the bullet to drop him where he stands. Before I started reloading I used to use the big old 180 grain round nose Core Lokts in my 30-06s and a shot through the ribs at the distances we're talking about up here would more than take them out where they stood most of the time. Then I started reloading and after some experimentation finally went with the Hornady 150 grain Interlocks that will do the same thing most of the time. I've been so happy with them that I also use them in my .243 Sako and 25-06 Ruger in 100 and 117 grains, respectively.

Last edited by Topgun 3006; 05-30-2015 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Spelling
Topgun 3006 is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 12:41 PM
  #28  
Boone & Crockett
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 15,546
Default

I use two rifles for deer. A model 88 win in .308 and a Marlin Guide gun in 45-70. With both, my aim point is in the crease behind the shoulder and almost all go down on the spot. Many times I don;t hit a rib and very little meat is wasted. Since I hunt for the meat and not the antlers, that is important to me.
Oldtimr is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 12:54 PM
  #29  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Default

Originally Posted by Oldtimr
I use two rifles for deer. A model 88 win in .308 and a Marlin Guide gun in 45-70. With both, my aim point is in the crease behind the shoulder and almost all go down on the spot. Many times I don;t hit a rib and very little meat is wasted. Since I hunt for the meat and not the antlers, that is important to me.
Yeppers!!!
Topgun 3006 is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 02:17 PM
  #30  
Nontypical Buck
 
MudderChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Germany/Calif.
Posts: 2,664
Default

I use much the same as Oldtimr does, .308 for Hogs and Deer, all the way up to Moose and Red Deer. I have a 35 Remington (9mm/200 grain) I use for brush country and I occasionally I use my slug gun when tracking wounded Hogs.

I have a .223 (actually 2) and using them on anything other than varmints has never crossed my mind. I'm not a newcomer to the .223, I shot my first maybe 45 years ago. Other than the weight of the ammo and maybe recoil a .308 will do everything a .223 can do and do it better and farther. There is little to no ballistic improvement of the .223 over the .308. Out to maybe 300 yards the ballistics are very similar.

I have a 30 06 I rarely shoot and a combo gun 12 gauge over 7X54 R I use occasionally. I also have a .222 that has been with me forever.

My .223's and .222 are mostly dust collectors. Mainly because they have been replaced by my .308, which does everything they will do and does it better, even on varmints.

Ammo is cheaper for the .223. I load my own so the cost for the larger caliber isn't that much of a factor.
MudderChuck is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.