Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

7mm or .300

Old 10-18-2011, 05:50 AM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sniper151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornwall, Pa.
Posts: 1,720
Default

They are both excellent calibers. My choice is the 7mm Rem Mag. Just my preference.
Sniper151 is offline  
Old 10-18-2011, 06:33 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adirondacks
Posts: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by skb2706 View Post
If you never leave IL then go with the smaller caliber. If you have plans that include something bigger then maybe bigger is better. I like .300 Win mags myself but thats what I hunt with most of the time.

Americans been baling out Europeans for over 100 years. What do they know ?
What does that have to do with guns?
Besides thanks to our illustrious leader and his socialist agenda we're well on our way to being in the same boat and China is bailing us out.
Bernie P. is offline  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:26 PM
  #13  
Fork Horn
 
streetglideok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 360
Default

I had a similar dilemna in '95 when trying to decide what gun to buy. I wanted a model 70 classic, in stainless, but didnt know if I wanted the 7mm rem mag, or the 300 win mag. Also was worried about the recoil. The gunshop only had the 7mm, so I took it home. Since then, she is on her second scope, and took off the synthetic stock, and added wood to her. Do I wish I bought a 300 sometimes? Sure. I can tell you this though, she has never let me down, and has dropped a few deer in her time. For me, the 300 would of been too big a jump from a 30/30. Either the 300, or 7mm, would work for anything in the lower 48. Ive shot both now, and like both equally. If you feel you may be a tad tender towards recoil, go with the 7mm. If you can handle magnum recoil and shoot accurately, then go with whatever floats your boat. If alaska is in your eyes, get the 7mm, and look to buy a 338 later. One never has too many guns. Lastly, convince the wife you need a 7mm, 300, and 338!
streetglideok is offline  
Old 10-19-2011, 07:17 PM
  #14  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 119
Default

I'd say there are about as many of one as the other here.And there a probably about the same number of 338's A lot of big brown rugs were made by all 3. I carry the 300 ,only because it seemed there were more different bullets for the30 cal. That was over 20 years ago and I've seen no reason to change, but would not feel under gunned with any of those.
aaalaska is offline  
Old 10-23-2011, 11:29 AM
  #15  
Typical Buck
 
emtrescue6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 647
Default

I own both cal's...a Rem 700 in 7mm Rem Mag and a Win Mod 70 in .300 WIN....my .270 WIN .308 WIN and 270 WSM will all perform equally (when hand loaded) with the 7mm or .300 WM...with less recoil and cheaper (ammo/reloading cost)...
emtrescue6 is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:20 PM
  #16  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

I own a 7MM RM because my small rifle is a .243.

My upgrade is a .338 WM.

I'll buy a .300 WM, after I get a .270.
Sheridan is offline  
Old 11-06-2011, 01:45 PM
  #17  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Allenton Wis.
Posts: 186
Default

The truth is a 30-06 is so close to a 7 rem. mag there is no advantage if ya reload. If ya can do it with a 300 win ya can do it with an 06 if the target is a bit closer. I always though neither was needed cause the 06 is right between them. If you need a magnum you need one big enough to make a difference, like a 338 win. Not that I care.
ihookem1 is offline  
Old 11-06-2011, 04:05 PM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Big Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West NE
Posts: 1,455
Default

Originally Posted by ihookem1 View Post
The truth is a 30-06 is so close to a 7 rem. mag there is no advantage if ya reload.
Ummm I reload, and I can still see the advantage of the 7. It takes a heavier-for-caliber bullet in a 30 cal to roll par with a 7's BC, and rolling heavy means losing velocity, and losing velocity means losing performance. So with this in thought, it takes a big boomer of a 30 cal to fly as slick as a 7 with a smaller appetite. Call me crazy, but I'll take the 7s smaller appetite of powder and bullet cost, less drop and drift to the 300.

I'll add this isn't anything to worry about on the hunting field. If you can't get close enough to down your game with a centerfire, you need to be a better hunter Buut when it comes to having fun, then there is an advantage. And I shoot way more at paper and steel than animals, so gimme the 7!
Big Z is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:58 AM
  #19  
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
Default

I have reloaded, shot, and hunted with both. IMO the 300 is the better choice because of the better bullet selection - especially the heavier ones. Never know when you will want to go get a bear, elk, or even African plains game. That said, I hunt with a 7mm only because I found a load with Barnes 175gn that is mind-boggling accurate..

You will be served well by both calibers..
Mark Schumacher is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 08:01 AM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Default

7mm08...i just got one, put the 300wsm,....well all the others probably wont see the outside of the safe this year.
halfbakedi420 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.