Of the three I would pick the Bushnell Elite 3200.

Leupold

I prefer the 3200

Uncle C.....I have read allot of controversy over the Aetec because I had posted the same question a while back between the Aetec and the Bushnell 3200. I had like the 44mm objective lens and the 5” eye relief from the Aetec so I bought it. Some fellow h unters say it’s garbage but I guess I’ll find out for my self. Now I do have a new Leupold also and I’m very impressed with this scope...Both scopes are on rifles to be used for deer hunting this fall so like I said I’ll find out about both scopes for myself. Good luck in your purchase.–

Had them all. Bushnell is good, but I only use them for .22' s. Simmons are junk. Leupold are nice, but Nikon' s are just as good if not better for less money. My .02 cents.

LEUPOLD!

i like burris

I guess Simmons has gone downhill. I have some older 44 mag simmons scopes and they have been great. They lie when they say 1/4 inch per click at 100 yards but at least it is consistant and they do hold zero well, even when under extreme conditions. never had one leak, fog, break or come off zero.. Very clear too. I guess they aren' t like that anymore though, darn.. I have three of them and my buddy who has an ffl sold them to me for $72 each a few years ago. They are 2-7 X 44. 44 mag series.. All three are going strong..

Personally I would look into the New Weaver Grand Slams. Great scope for the money. I would take it over the Leupold Vari-X III' s any day.

Jon Jackoviak
The Optic Zone
www.theopticzone.com
[email protected]