1954 marlin 30-30 or 1964 marlin 35mm?
#1
Thread Starter
Spike
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
A friend is selling and I cant decide which of the 2 marlins to choose. I like the history behind both rounds, but there is something likeable about that lil 20 in. barrel on the 35mm. Off our shooting lanes can get snarly, so when we are tracking other people's deer
the 35 with its small size and slight increase in power seems the ideal, but I've always wanted a 30-30 so i'm torn.....
the 35 with its small size and slight increase in power seems the ideal, but I've always wanted a 30-30 so i'm torn.....
#2
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 3
From: west central wi USA
I assume you meant 35 cal. A 35 caliber will have more energy than a 30-30. Given the choice, I think the .35 is a better cartridge. They even make chamber adapters to allow you to shoot a .38 pistol cartridge in a 35. Same diameter, believe it or not.
#6
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
I have both and about the same age. Either one will work fine for you. The .35 Remington will shoot a 200 grain bullet and the largest the .30/30 uses is a 170. The deer really wouldn't know the difference. I pretty much just use whichever one is easiest to grab.
#7
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
I own a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem. Good round!! But here's a little food for thought,in my neck of the woods .35's are going for $28 a box 30 30's are $18 a box. The 30 30's are readily availible,the .35's are getting harder to find.I've owned both calibers & to be honest with you the both killed deer very dead.IMO half a dozen of one 6 of the other.



