lets disccuss rate of twist
#21
This works fine in rifle-length barrels with the Hornet?s standard 45-grain (or lighter) bullets but not so well with other popular .224-caliber bullets weighing 50 grains and up (especially the long-nosed ones).
The 22 hornet was never designed to shoot heavy, long sleek bullets. People that are loading longer, heavier, and sleeker bullets are asking it to do something for which it was never designed. These people will obviously need to rebarrel with a faster twist barrel in order to shoot these bullets.
Bullet weight has absolutely nothing to do with determining the proper twist rate for a bullet. Bullet length is what matters. Look at a hornets bullet profile and look at the profile of a bullet designed for the .223 or 22-250.
Now, the hand gun dilemma I fully agree with due to the velocity loss in a 10" - 14" barrel vs. a rifle barrel.
You may be surprised to know that a .22 long rifle barrel twist rate is also 1 in 16".
Last edited by bigbulls; 02-10-2010 at 09:03 PM.
#22
ok, so some maker produces a hornet in a 1/12 twist so john the reloader can load up 50 gr v-max's, he's happy, however all the average joe's who bought this same rifle are furious because all the 45 gr factory loads can't keep the jackets on due to too much spin. Who out there builds factory loads with a 50 gr bullet?
a hornet is only gonna get 3 k and 2900 out of a 40 and 45 gr.
My NEF hornet is a 1-9 twist and it shoots 50 gr 45 gr and 40 gr hanloads, and 45 gr factory loads with the same POI out of all of them. She'll put 50 rounds in a 2" circle at a 100 using any one of these ammo
#24
Again, I am going to say this as plainly as I can. The 22 hornet was never designed to shoot long, sleek bullets. It was designed to shoot very light weight bullets with very short ogives which makes a very short bullet. The 1 in 16 twist is more than acceptable for the intended purpose of the cartridge when it was designed.
A short and fat 35 grain bullet designed for the hornet.

A long and sleek 40 grain bullet for the faster 22 centerfires but should still be plenty stable in the hornets 16 twist.

A long sleek 50 grain bullet that likely would not be stable in the hornet.
A short and fat 35 grain bullet designed for the hornet.

A long and sleek 40 grain bullet for the faster 22 centerfires but should still be plenty stable in the hornets 16 twist.

A long sleek 50 grain bullet that likely would not be stable in the hornet.
#26
big bulls the hornet was designed for 45 gr bullets and a 1-16 was not fast enough.
from wikipedia:
"Older guns generally have a slower twist rate of 1-16" (or one turn in every 16 inches (410 mm) of barrel length) for lighter bullets with a .223 caliber dimension. Newer guns feature a faster 1-14" twist for 40 to 45-grain (2.9 g) bullets in the more standard .224 caliber."
the hornet was never known for accuracy in the early days, the 1-16 was the problem
some guns shot the 45gr ok and some didnt
why do manufacturers still build this gun in a 1-16 ? its not 1930 anymore.
go to this link and punch in the numbers.
http://www.realguns.com/calculators/riflingtwist.html
40gr vmax is .676 long at 2980 = a 1-13.4 twist
from wikipedia:
"Older guns generally have a slower twist rate of 1-16" (or one turn in every 16 inches (410 mm) of barrel length) for lighter bullets with a .223 caliber dimension. Newer guns feature a faster 1-14" twist for 40 to 45-grain (2.9 g) bullets in the more standard .224 caliber."
the hornet was never known for accuracy in the early days, the 1-16 was the problem
some guns shot the 45gr ok and some didnt
why do manufacturers still build this gun in a 1-16 ? its not 1930 anymore.
go to this link and punch in the numbers.
http://www.realguns.com/calculators/riflingtwist.html
40gr vmax is .676 long at 2980 = a 1-13.4 twist



