Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Tikka or Savage??? >

Tikka or Savage???

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Tikka or Savage???

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-14-2010, 07:12 PM
  #31  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 107
Default

Thanks for the suggestions... I am ready to squeeze off a couple of rounds
bbbagman is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:10 AM
  #32  
Nontypical Buck
 
Pawildman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Posts: 2,600
Default

Originally Posted by VAhuntr
I hope you have my post confused with vabyrd?

..............Oooops.....Sorry 'bout that.......
Pawildman is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:58 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by VAhuntr
The Federal Premium Vital Shocks with 117 grain Sierra GK's were very accurate in my .25-06. The Hornady 117 grain BTSP's shot within and inch of the Federal's.

I'm sure he's curious, as I am, as to the performance of these compared to your handloads.
vabyrd is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 09:58 AM
  #34  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

A 150 fps loss in velocity out of a .25-06 makes it a .257 roberts.
Understand ?
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 10:09 AM
  #35  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
A 150 fps loss in velocity out of a .25-06 makes it a .257 roberts.
Understand ?
And you can tell the difference?
vabyrd is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 10:21 AM
  #36  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

yes............................
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 10:29 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
yes............................
Other than with a chronograph and a target that prints little low.
vabyrd is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 10:43 AM
  #38  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

and the hole it puts in deer
once you get above 3k fps theres a noticable difference in the hole
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 11:12 AM
  #39  
Nontypical Buck
 
VAhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 3,116
Default

Originally Posted by vabyrd
I'm sure he's curious, as I am, as to the performance of these compared to your handloads.

This was over 2 years ago, so I don't have the actual #'s but here is what I can tell you. I was very happy with the Tikka accuracy wise, but at the same time disappointed with its speed. It would not duplicate the factory published numbers. My friends' Ruger M77 and Rem 700 would. In fact the Ruger, with its 26" barrel exceeded the published velocities. When we switched over to handloads the Tikka still lagged behind.

Based on these observations, it is my opinion that the shorter barreled Tikka is just slower. I have read on other reloading forums that Tikka and Sako barrels tend to run slower than some other makes. Why this happens I have no idea and like I said, had I played around more, I might have found a "speedier" load.

I have nothing against Tikka and would buy another in a heartbeat, in fact I looked at a .308 Win the other day but the shop would not budge on their inflated price.
VAhuntr is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:50 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
and the hole it puts in deer
once you get above 3k fps theres a noticable difference in the hole
So a 110 grain pill going 3,400 out of a 270 might get a little messy?


Originally Posted by VAhuntr
This was over 2 years ago, so I don't have the actual #'s but here is what I can tell you. I was very happy with the Tikka accuracy wise, but at the same time disappointed with its speed. It would not duplicate the factory published numbers. My friends' Ruger M77 and Rem 700 would. In fact the Ruger, with its 26" barrel exceeded the published velocities. When we switched over to handloads the Tikka still lagged behind.

Based on these observations, it is my opinion that the shorter barreled Tikka is just slower. I have read on other reloading forums that Tikka and Sako barrels tend to run slower than some other makes. Why this happens I have no idea and like I said, had I played around more, I might have found a "speedier" load.

I have nothing against Tikka and would buy another in a heartbeat, in fact I looked at a .308 Win the other day but the shop would not budge on their inflated price.
Can you switch to a faster burning powder or are you stuck with the 3% loss?
vabyrd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.