[Deleted]
#13
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: VA USA
PA, of the three you metioned, I prefer the Sigs or Para guns. I don' t care for the bulky, blocky feel of the Ruger autos. I' m not a fan of " cocked and locked" , but I do like the LDA Para line. The sig 239 makes an excellent concealed carry gun.
#14
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Newport MI USA
My dad lives by his sig, I have a H&K USP .45 and it is the best gun in my opinion. I also know a couple of guys who own sigs and like them alot. I would recommend the sig out of the three you are looking at. Try a Kimber or an H&K out though!
#15
Go in the middle and get a 40 S&W. I' ve never been much on 9mm.I carry a Glock M-27 and love it.Of course they run higher then what you want to spend.Between the 9 and 45 I would go with the 45 acp.
Ruger Redhawk
Ruger Redhawk
#17
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: God\'s Country,AR USA
Just a question: Why dont you like Glocks? I didnt like them until I bought one. I had never shot one untill then, and I love mine now. Also, be careful with the PAra' s. Everyone that I have shot are made just like the colts, and are finicky about what ammo you put throught them. They need to be throated and ramped to accept semi wadcutters and some hollow points.
#18
Fork Horn
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
I have a permit to carry up here in Michigan, my 40 cal. Beretta couger handels great. at some times it can be a little big. in the summer I use my Kahr in a 40 cal. I can put it in the pocket of my cargo shorts. neather one is cheep
Non the less, the 40 cal. is what I want if my life or the life of my family is on the line.
Non the less, the 40 cal. is what I want if my life or the life of my family is on the line.




