Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 243 vs 30-30 >

243 vs 30-30

Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

243 vs 30-30

Old 09-03-2009, 05:04 PM
  #71  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 132
Default

Dean, I just bought a Tikka 243 with a synthic stock and I love this gun, it was fairly inexpensive, and it has and adjustable trigger. I have always hunted with my 30.06 and 308 and to be honest they are more gun than I need to hunt in MN with the average weight of deer in the 100-200Lb range. The 243 is a FUN Gun to shoot! Ammo is priced right and easly avaible. For hunting the worst thing you can do is flinch! And I know this from experience, get the 243 and don't look back.
sauer06 is offline  
Old 09-04-2009, 06:53 PM
  #72  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,278
Default

I haved used both a 30-30 and a 243. I had no problems with either. Shots out to 150 yards are fine with the 30-30. Beyond that the 243 outshines it. The 243 has milder recoil than the 30-30. If you are worried about penetration on hogs with the 243 then use a tougher bullet like the TSX. You would have a hard time getting one of those to stop in a hog from any angle. But I have shot hogs with a 243 and standard cup and core lead tipped bullets. They all died. Large hogs can be tougher than deer especially the boars which develope a shield behind their shoulders. But that shield isn't bullet proof and I have killed even 200 lb hogs with a 22 magnum before. A 243 is hell and gone more powerful than that.
Todd1700 is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 04:18 AM
  #73  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default

The 243 is superior to the 30/30 for all applications.
eldeguello is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 07:08 AM
  #74  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

Originally Posted by eldeguello View Post
The 243 is superior to the 30/30 for all applications.
I'll second that!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 09:47 AM
  #75  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

X3!!!!!!!!!!
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 11:11 AM
  #76  
Fork Horn
 
shottyhunter24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 389
Default

i'd choose the 30-30
shottyhunter24 is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 12:21 PM
  #77  
Boone & Crockett
 
Phil from Maine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 12,331
Default

I would choose the 30-30 as well.. But i am impartial to them concidering that is all the rifle i have hunted with for the last 34 years with. i do choose the marlin over the winchesters anyday though.. The 243 does have more range and is flatter shooting so it would also depend on the kind of are you are hunting in as well.. Wide open vurses woods and brush.. Also if it is so far away I need a tri-pod to help hold the rifle steady why am I shooting at it?
Phil from Maine is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.