Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

simple ranking

Old 12-24-2007 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default simple ranking

Ok, Im considering rifles. Which do you prefer, Sako,Cz, Tika or another?

keylargo is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2007 | 06:06 AM
  #2  
stalkingbear's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
From: central Ky
Default RE: simple ranking

Sakos are great factory rifles but look up the posts about browning a-bolts which are my favorite.
stalkingbear is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2007 | 06:54 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default RE: simple ranking

I think the best bang for your buck would have to go to CZ in my opinion. I have the CZ American in .22 and this thing is built like a $700 American made rifle. It's an absolute tack driver too.
Simp is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2007 | 08:02 AM
  #4  
Retaks's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default RE: simple ranking

I have a CZ and a Tikka and love them both. Sakos are also great rifles though. They make Tikka. Also i was looking at a Ruger M77 Hawkeye when i got my Tikka and like them both but the Tikka was a little shorter so that made my decision. If i didnt want a shorter lightweight gun i prob would have had to flip a coin. I have also shot a few Browning A-Bolts that shoot great.
Retaks is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2007 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
Spike
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: NW Missouri
Default RE: simple ranking

There is a pretty wide range of prices between the three. If money does not come into the question, I would pick the Sako, if it is the biggest factor, I would most likely pick the CZ. I have a Sako 75, and consider it head and shoulders above the other 2 - smoother action by far, and I really like the stock design. The Tikka is a cheaper version of the Sako - in all respects, especially fit and finish. The CZ is a fine rifle, but not quite as refined as the Sako. All 3 will most likely shoot around MOA or better, so it will really depend on what you want/need and which fits you best.

Jason
nwMOgsp is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2007 | 07:11 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: simple ranking

There is no comparison between the three....The Sako is head and shoulders above the other two and the CZ in my opinion is in last place. I love the set trigger, but that's where it ends.....crude fit and finish and no more accurate than the similar priced Tikka. The Sakos have a reputation out of the 60's and 70's.....not sure they are holding true for the price. Thank you Beretta. Regards, Rick.
48thguns is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2007 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Default RE: simple ranking

All three are good rifles, but as the other have said the quality runs from good to great, CZ, Tikka, then Sako. Most of the CZ's I've fired are very accurate. The rimfires usually shoot like rifle twice their price. Every Tikka and Sako I've owned have been capable of 1/2" or less at 100 yards with their favorite handloads. Most of them would do it with select factory loads.
jtb1967 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pawildman
Technical Help
1
09-23-2007 05:19 PM
BowHunterJim
Bowhunting
17
08-23-2007 12:44 AM
Primitive Weapon
Bowhunting
8
10-11-2005 06:41 PM
Daffy
Enhancement Request / Wish List
3
02-14-2004 04:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.