.308 vs. .270
#2
Click here... It's already been discussed.
http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=2497871
Edit: I personally favor the .308 due to its legendary accuracy and besides, the ammo is cheaper. The .308 and .270 both will do the job.
http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=2497871
Edit: I personally favor the .308 due to its legendary accuracy and besides, the ammo is cheaper. The .308 and .270 both will do the job.
#4
Spike
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From:
CAN'T GO WRONG WITH EITHER CALIBERS, I HAVE BOTH AND HAVE TAKEN DEER WITH THEM BOTH. MY CHOICE FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS IS THE .270 IN A REMINGTON MODEL BDL WITH A RAMLINE STOCK. HAVE SHOT ONLY HANDLOADS FROM MY .270 SINCE IT WAS NEW.
MOOSE
MOOSE
#6
Go with the .308.... It is a great round, with heavier bullets available in factory loadings.
It is also a short action caliber, and is available in more compact firearms than the .270. It is available in standard size guns, but if you want a Remington Model 7 ora Ruger M77 Compact or something like those, you have to get the .308 as they are not made in .270, and I love the shorter guns. They carry and point easier, and they are a lot more user friendly in a tree stand.
I own both of the guns mentioned above, and they see more use than any of my standard length guns, or the long action cal's.
Good luck
It is also a short action caliber, and is available in more compact firearms than the .270. It is available in standard size guns, but if you want a Remington Model 7 ora Ruger M77 Compact or something like those, you have to get the .308 as they are not made in .270, and I love the shorter guns. They carry and point easier, and they are a lot more user friendly in a tree stand.
I own both of the guns mentioned above, and they see more use than any of my standard length guns, or the long action cal's.
Good luck



