Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 Grain conversion?  Is my math correct? >

Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-08-2007, 09:37 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Default Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

My 12 ga Hornady sst's say they are 300 grains. My pocket ref. says there are 480 grains to 1 ounce. That means these are only 5/8 oz slugs?
TimHixson is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 09:48 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

ORIGINAL: TimHixson

My 12 ga Hornady sst's say they are 300 grains. My pocket ref. says there are 480 grains to 1 ounce. That means these are only 5/8 oz slugs?
There are 437.5 grains per ounce (7000 divided by 16). Those "slugs" aren't slugs at all, they are 300-grain bullets. As such, they are much smaller in diameter than a 12-ga SLUG, (maybe .50 as opposeed to .70) and they have a much greater sectional density and probably a higherballistic coefficient as well. This means they hold velocity alot better than a slug, and will also out-penetrate any full-bore size slug, even one weighing a lot more. You are comparing apples to pumpkins here!

You just cannot evaluate a bullet using the same criteria you use to evaluate a Foster or Brenneke-type shotgun slug. When you use those loads, you are in effect turning your shotgun into a big-bore rifle like a .45/70. I am assuming that your shotgun has a rifled bore, as those "slugs" will have to have a spin to work.
eldeguello is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 10:16 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

yes, I am shooting a Rem. 870 with fully rifled barrel. I agree that it seems these SST's are alot closer to a rifle cartrige than plastic coated ball of lead. I feel that they are my best option here in Indiana since we are only allowed to use shotguns or smoke poles.

I like apples better than pumpkins anyway!
TimHixson is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 10:54 AM
  #4  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 220
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

Tim,
We have a few more options this year... They have changed it so that we can use rifles, with the only catch being that it has to be a chambered in a legal hand gun cartridge. As before we can use handguns chambered in high power rounds. Hopefully in the next few years they combine the two to let us use high power rifles... I know this went tangent to the original thread, but just wanted to share.

rynigner is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:21 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

ORIGINAL: TimHixson

yes, I am shooting a Rem. 870 with fully rifled barrel. I agree that it seems these SST's are alot closer to a rifle cartrige than plastic coated ball of lead. I feel that they are my best option here in Indiana since we are only allowed to use shotguns or smoke poles.

I like apples better than pumpkins anyway!
I certainly agree that the new "slugs" which consist of aerodynamically superior bullets loaded into shotgun bore-size sabots are much better ammunition for hunting game the size of deer or larger. They make a gun like yours with a rifled bore into the equivalent of a .45 or .50 -caliber rifle. With this kind of ammunition, even the 20-ga becomes entirely suitable for big game at ranges outto at least 150 yards, or perhaps more.

The last time I hunted in Indiana, (Camp Atterbury and Crane Naval Ammunition Depot), I used a muzzleloader becauseI believed (still do!)that a rifled bore is superior to a smooth one any time the target is oever 50 yards away. These new rifled shotguns and the new ammo make using "shotguns" an entirely different proposition!

Good luck!
eldeguello is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:34 AM
  #6  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,040
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

Nevermind. Didn't read the whole thread...
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:50 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

ORIGINAL: rynigner

Tim,
We have a few more options this year... They have changed it so that we can use rifles, with the only catch being that it has to be a chambered in a legal hand gun cartridge. As before we can use handguns chambered in high power rounds. Hopefully in the next few years they combine the two to let us use high power rifles... I know this went tangent to the original thread, but just wanted to share.
Can you show me where this is on the state website? I have always been told that we are not allowed to use the high powered rifles due to the land being too flat which would result in too may houses getting shot.
TimHixson is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:52 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 54
Default RE: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?

ORIGINAL: eldeguello

ORIGINAL: TimHixson

yes, I am shooting a Rem. 870 with fully rifled barrel. I agree that it seems these SST's are alot closer to a rifle cartrige than plastic coated ball of lead. I feel that they are my best option here in Indiana since we are only allowed to use shotguns or smoke poles.

I like apples better than pumpkins anyway!
I certainly agree that the new "slugs" which consist of aerodynamically superior bullets loaded into shotgun bore-size sabots are much better ammunition for hunting game the size of deer or larger. They make a gun like yours with a rifled bore into the equivalent of a .45 or .50 -caliber rifle. With this kind of ammunition, even the 20-ga becomes entirely suitable for big game at ranges outto at least 150 yards, or perhaps more.

The last time I hunted in Indiana, (Camp Atterbury and Crane Naval Ammunition Depot), I used a muzzleloader becauseI believed (still do!)that a rifled bore is superior to a smooth one any time the target is oever 50 yards away. These new rifled shotguns and the new ammo make using "shotguns" an entirely different proposition!

Good luck!
Theses sst's show to be zero'd at 150 yards and only drop 6.7" at 200 yards. It will take a little time (and practice) to get used to the idea of a shotgun being good past 125 yards.

It's funny that you mention the 20 ga. I have been considering trying a nicer automatic type 20ga as my 870 kicks more than I really like.
TimHixson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dark Helmet
Whitetail Deer Hunting
21
10-21-2008 01:50 PM
burntmuch
Black Powder
9
08-03-2008 01:25 PM
JNTURK
Bowhunting
4
12-31-2007 09:16 AM
JNTURK
Technical
4
12-30-2007 12:18 PM
PSEarcher149
Big Game Hunting
5
11-14-2005 08:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Grain conversion? Is my math correct?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.