![]() |
RE: 35 Whelen
I am starting to build a 35 whelan on a budget. Anyway, i've hammered a fewmoose ect..with 350 Rem. mags and they are the same difference to a Whelen. They do work pretty good, it's just at that time, i was crawling around in the bush after brown bearsand from my test the .338-06 would out penetrate the 35's... So i went with the .338-06 instead.. These days with NP's available in 35 cal., that may change things a bit?? DM |
RE: 35 Whelen
you folks that call the 35 Whelen slow and lacking "power" really crack me up... :eek:
|
RE: 35 Whelen
ORIGINAL: Chantecler111 I've had experience with that same, rifle/caliber combo before, I haven't been to impressed with the .35 Whelen, its slow, and big, and not all that powerful. The gun you speak of, however, would make a good gun to carry in the woods. I wonder how you can have experience with that rifle/cartridge combo since its quite new? This reply shows me that you have never killed any game with a .35 cal rifle and I wonder if you have ever owned one at all since its not called "Magnum"? As for factory ammo, remington chambers this round again and has for a while which will guarantee factory ammo will be around. If you don't have "real" experience with this round then don't give advice. Especially when you base your information on magazine articles.[:@] |
RE: 35 Whelen
The 35 Whelen deveopes nearly 3400 lbs ME with a 225 grain bullet. Remington loads a 200 grain and 250 grain Corlokts for it. I have heard that Federal is going to drop the ammo for it but I can't swear to that. Its also handy that you can load the 357 pistol bullets in it for plinking. Sierra makes a 200 grain round nose and a 225 Grain BTSP.
I have one in the NEF Handi rifle. You can add some more punch to this one in the NEF by reaming it to 35 Hhelen AI. Have not tried the Remington semi auto. |
RE: 35 Whelen
ORIGINAL: TerryM ORIGINAL: Chantecler111 I've had experience with that same, rifle/caliber combo before, I haven't been to impressed with the .35 Whelen, its slow, and big, and not all that powerful. The gun you speak of, however, would make a good gun to carry in the woods. I wonder how you can have experience with that rifle/cartridge combo since its quite new? This reply shows me that you have never killed any game with a .35 cal rifle and I wonder if you have ever owned one at all since its not called "Magnum"? As for factory ammo, remington chambers this round again and has for a while which will guarantee factory ammo will be around. If you don't have "real" experience with this round then don't give advice. Especially when you base your information on magazine articles.[:@] |
RE: 35 Whelen
This thread cracks me up. The 35 Whelen and Ackley Improved version are the hardest hitting non-magnumMoose cartridges on Earth. A 250 gr Grand Slam Speer at 2600'/sec zeroed at 150 yards is one inch high at 100 yards with 3179'/lbs energy and -2.7 low at 200 yards with 2570' lbs energy. Add 100'/sec for the Ackley and the numbers are more impressive
A 150 gr 30'06 Nosler going 2900'/sec at the muzzle at100 and 200 yards have around 500'/lbs less energy at each range. Now someone here please school me on how anemic the 35 Whelen cartridge is or please post some numbers to challenge this data....shoot, use 300 Win Mag data for all I care! This is crazy! I want emperical evidence not "I think" stuff.:D Regards, Rick. |
RE: 35 Whelen
The 35's lack the SD of the .338, as well.
|
RE: 35 Whelen
The hardest hitting non magnum on earth is the 50 BMG.
|
RE: 35 Whelen
I like this calibre a lot. I shot my first deer with it, and have carried it on a few moose hunts too. I like it because I don't find the recoil bad at all with factory Remington 250's, and it'll knock things down in a hurry.
![]() My first deer, 20 yards with a .35 Whelen |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.