Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

338 win mag ??

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-13-2006 | 06:15 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From:
Default 338 win mag ??

Just loaded some 338 Win mags in 185, and 210 gn TSXs. Both shoot extremely well at 100 yards. Given the two loads, what are your thoughts as to what weight would be better for Elk/Mule deer hunt?

Thanks in advance,
R1
Raptor 1 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 06:23 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,145
Likes: 0
From: IOWA/25' UP
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

Both will work fine; whatever shoots the most accurate. I would probably go with the 185 for a flatter trajectory. There is no wrong answer.
hardcorehunter is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 06:46 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: Bradford, Ontario
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

The .338 is designed to give optimal performance with heavy bullets. If I wanted to shoot 185 gr bulets I would carry an 06 or .300 mag. I have taken deer with my .338 and 250gr partitions ( chance encounter while moose hunting ) and they drop dead quite nicely.
TerryM is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 07:33 AM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

210 would be a minimum in that caliber otherwise carry a 300 win mag or wsm.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 08:43 AM
  #5  
Pawildman's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

200 gr. and up................
Pawildman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 09:49 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

If you are talking about "typical" bullets like CoreLokts, Partitions, Ballistic Tips etc then yeah I say go heavier. BUT you asked about TSXs, these aren't your normal bullets. I can promise you that 185 TSX will out penetrate and out perform ANY weight "typicals". If you still aren't sold then step up too the 210s, but I personally would go with the lighter variety.

Welcome too the "new" generation of bullets,
RA
RedAllison is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

Thats true. I quess I overlooked the Barnes part. You can go a weight or two lighter with the X bullets for sure. I kinda quit using them because I got tired of scrubbing out copper but they are a top notch performer.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
GooseHunter Jr.'s Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

I like any bullet over 200 grain in my .338. I am a fan of Nosler and 200 and 225 grain Accubons shoot very well out of my gun...have not tried the 180 grain AB as of yet.
GooseHunter Jr. is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-2006 | 10:21 PM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

For elk using the .338 Win. Mag. a 225 gr. premium bulet would be a good choice. Good luck.
handloader1 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #10  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Default RE: 338 win mag ??

Bullistics are real close on these - for energy I would go with the 210g.
Nord QC Bouman is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.