Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

zeiss

Old 01-03-2006, 09:27 AM
  #11  
Fork Horn
 
jdreddish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 369
Default RE: zeiss

I got one for you bigbulls

how do you pronounce "Hogue"
jdreddish is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 09:57 AM
  #12  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: zeiss

I thought the 3x9 would be just fine eye relief wasnt a big factor since my nikon hasn't give me a dinger but my buddy shot it and got it right in the bridge of the nose. Do you believe zeiss is better than leupold
bigiron is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 02:52 PM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Olive Branch MS USA
Posts: 1,032
Default RE: zeiss

ORIGINAL: bigiron
Do you believe zeiss is better than leupold
I believe the Zeiss Conquest is slightly optically superior to comparable Leupolds. At least that's been my experience with the ones I've owned. I also prefer the etched Zeiss Z-plex reticle to the wire Leupold duplex. From a durability standpoint, I've had no problems with either brand. If I were buying another scope right now, it would more than likely be another Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40.


Solitary Man is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 03:09 PM
  #14  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
Default RE: zeiss

Do you believe zeiss is better than leupold
I was convinced enough to replace all four leupold 3.5x10x40s on my hunting rifles with 3x9 ziess scopes.
stubblejumper is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 03:30 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
jcchartboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,233
Default RE: zeiss

The only real advantage to the 3.5x10x44 is if you spend a great deal of time developing loads at the range. It may possibly help you to eek out those last few tenths of an inch in group size.

Otherwise I think the 3-9x40 certainly is the winner for a standard hunting scope.


jcchartboy is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:08 PM
  #16  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: zeiss

What alot of people don't realize is the objective size has more to do with resolution than anything. Whats the use of a 6-24 power when you can't resolve your small target at 500 or 600 yards. And if your not shooting over 500 yards, why get a 6-24 power scope? You can do the same with a 10 power. For a max of 5X, 20mm is fine. Your limiting factor is power, not resolution. For a max of 10 power, 40mm is fine. for 14 power, I would opt for the 44mm. For anything over that, I would opt for the 50mm or larger. Just like the folks who by a 5meg digital camera but with a 10mm or smaller lenses. Why?That objective can't resolve the picture enough to ultilize the 5meg of info on a picture. Try blowing it up. Sure, you got alot of pixels, but they are fuzzy.

The only other thing is 50mm usually gives more FOV. But any shooter that uses a scoped rifle should be able to point thier rifle in a direction and find the animal.

I am sure most of use have bought these powerful 10X binocs with little tiny lenses. Some of us, not naming names probably bought these very poweful 20X with little lenses, but you cannot resolve your animal at long distances with the 20X. But a guy with a 8X50mm binocs can easily resolve the antlers, the points or whatever.
 
Old 01-05-2006, 04:31 PM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 41
Default RE: zeiss

I would go for a 50 mm or even better 56 mm. Own 2 Zeiss with 56 mm objektive lenses. The best scopes I own.
300grains is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 08:02 PM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,785
Default RE: zeiss

I have (3) 4.5-14x44's, (2) 6.5-20x50's, and (1) 3-12x56 all Conquests. They are all great and collect light really well. I am selling the 3-12x56 because it is too large and heavy for my taste. It works great and collects light very well, but I prefer the 4.5-14x44 for a "carry" gun.
retrieverman is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 11:35 PM
  #19  
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
Default RE: zeiss

I have both conquest models you are considering and I don't notice any real difference between the 2. So I would agree keep the extra 150 in your jeans. If you don't have good mounts then I'd put it towards some good quality rings/bases to hold her tight on the 300.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dtgb115
Archery Gear
2
03-22-2008 08:25 PM
Indyultra
Guns
2
01-11-2007 04:44 AM
screaming jimmy
Hunting Gear
0
04-15-2005 07:59 PM
luckyone
Hunting Gear Discussion
1
01-22-2005 08:48 AM
Power
Guns
34
05-24-2003 05:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: zeiss


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.