Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
.270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag >

.270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-06-2002, 09:21 AM
  #21  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

James B-Your 280 numbers sound right but unless you have a shorter than normal barrel on your 7mm mag you are underloading it.I have yet to see a 7mm mag that would not deliver 3200fps with a 24" barrel with proper handloads.I have seen some that exceeded 3300fps with no pressure problems.
stubblejumper is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 11:20 AM
  #22  
Nontypical Buck
 
Ruger-Redhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,918
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

I have both calibers mentioned.I haven't shot a deer with the 7mm Rem Mag yet.I do know the .270 Win will lay them low.I've shot enough with it to know what it can do with proper shot placement.Last year I did lose a nice Doe using the 270. I broke her shoulder and never did find her.For the most part it's hard to beat the 270 for Whitetails.Everybody has different opinions.But I do like the 270Win.....along with many other calibers available..... Ruger Redhawk

Support the NRA...Protecting our Gun Rights and Freedoms is everybody's responsibility. Ruger Redhawk A proud NRA Life Member since 1977.
Ruger-Redhawk is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 07:29 PM
  #23  
Host of Hosts
 
PABuck_HNTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,780
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

I like my .270's I always thought a 7mm mag was overkill for deer, but that's just my opinion.

SUPPORT YOUR SPORT
JOIN THE NRA






PABuck_HNTR is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 09:45 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 08:07 AM
  #25  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Alvarado Texas USA
Posts: 89
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

I like the 270 and find that it is perfect for Texas deer and hog hunting. Anyone that tells you some 7 mag is a better long range cartridge on deer is talking thru his hat. There is a noticable difference in recoil that will show itself when you are hanging off a tree on a strap on tree stand or shooting from a box blind thru a slit.
rickt300 is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 10:01 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waco TX USA
Posts: 14
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

Thanks for all the comments. I decided on the .270. Like I said, I was leaning that way. Plus I decided I wanted the Winchester M70 Featherweight which doesn't come in 7mm Rem Mag (only WSM). Man is that gun scarce right now. I bought the only one in the area (but got a great price on it somehow). If I had waited I probably wouldn't have gotten it. Winchester seems to be making a lot more of their .270 WSM because everyone seems to have those in stock.

I decided that if I want more gun to hutn elk, I'll buy another in the future.

BTW, the 7mm Rem Mag comes in a comparable gun to the Featherweight, the Classic Sporter LT. But good luck finding one.
redfish76 is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 12:05 PM
  #27  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,168
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

good job on deciding with the .270, its a good choice

propmahn
you can never have too many guns
propmahn is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 10:53 PM
  #28  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

Good choice, the .270 will work fine on even the big elk. I'm getting ready to use mine on an elk, hopefully, in 2 days. You won't need a different rifle unless you want to go for moose and even then it will get the job done with todays premium bullets.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 10-11-2002, 10:05 AM
  #29  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wheat Ridge Colorado USA
Posts: 60
Default RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag

For all practical purposes the 7mm Mag is a .30-06 with a belt. It does have some advantage in that one can use lighter bullets without sacrificing sectional density and hence get a flatter trajectory than an equivalent sectional density load in .30-06, however, the .270 does pretty much the same thing, so you made the right choice I think.

Both loads are in the .30-06 class and hence adequate for most anything in North America, but the .270 will be a tad easier to shoot and cheaper as well. People say they don't notice the difference in recoil between the 7mm Mag and the .30-06, but it's there and you notice it if you shoot enough.

Whatever's wrong ain't the bow and whatever's right is the archer.
seymour is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.