Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-02-2002 | 11:17 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Grand Bay, AL
Default Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

I was browsing the site and looked at the weight on this rifle, 8 POUNDS! Now I know that this includes a 26" bbl, but nonetheless, can that weight be lightened? Maybe have the barrel cut and recrowned to 22" and have an inch or an inch and a half cut from the butt of the stock (I am quite a small framed guy and like the feel of a shorter length of pull) and have the forend shorted and thinned. Do you think this would shave a pound or two off that weight? Thanks for the info guys.

"Clutz by Nature, Hospitalized by Fate..."

Pyral
pyral is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-2002 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
Spike
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Hampton GA Hampton, GA USA
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Pryral, when you compare a Ruger 1B to Remington 700 BDL (both .270s)you'll find the Remington is a 1/4-inch longer and 5/8s of a pound lighter than the Ruger 1B. The Ruger 1B has a 26-inch barrel compared to a Rem 700's 22-inch barrel due to the bolt action of the Rem 700 takes up so much space.

If you need a short pull rifle in single shot try the H&R Handi Rifle (barrels made by Ruger, firearm assembled by New England Firearms @$200). The Handi Rifle is 7lbs, 38-inches overall w/22-inch barrel w/13.5-inch pull.

Cutting up a Ruger 1B is an awful thing to contemplate.

Heaven is best viewed from a deer stand at sunrise in the forest

Favorite Sticker: Vegetarian is Indian for Lousy Hunter
Chipola Creek is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-2002 | 03:31 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Thank you Chipola for your kind comment regarding Ruger 1bs, it would be blasphemy to chop up any ruger single shot..Pyral if you don't like the weight buy the 1a.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-2002 | 03:44 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

I think its fine to DOWNSIZE a #1, IF and ONLY IF You have it dont by someone who makes it look at least as good as the way it looks now. It MUST be well done. if you go cheap, i say go handi instead

propmahn
you can never have too many guns
propmahn is offline  
Reply
Old 10-02-2002 | 10:15 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Grand Bay, AL
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Why is it a terible thing to contemplate? You do the same thing to any other rifle you purchase. Take a Mod 70 or 700, if you don't like the way its bedded, you inlet more or glass it. If you think the stock feels too big, you sand it down and refinish it. Don't like the length of the bbl, have it cut down to make it handle better. It is nothing more than custom gun work to make yourself happier. I just want to know if my proposal if possible. Besides, the 1a doesn't offer the caliber I like!

"Clutz by Nature, Hospitalized by Fate..."

Pyral
pyral is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2002 | 07:04 AM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Well Pyral, being that the 1A is chambered in 270,7x57 and 30-06 you can have it rechambered to any caliber you want . it would be a simple rechambering and extractor job . My personal favorite is the 1-S but have not run across any but if I do it's my next single shot . I own a 1b in 280 now.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-03-2002 | 05:25 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Grand Bay, AL
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Alright, both the 1a and the 1b have a MSRP of $850 on the website. Now add a barrel job to the 1a versus glassing, slimming the stock, and having the barrel cut down 4 inches. Which do you think is more economical?

"Clutz by Nature, Hospitalized by Fate..."

Pyral
pyral is offline  
Reply
Old 10-04-2002 | 07:44 AM
  #8  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

Depending on the caliber you choose you might not have to rebarrel that 1a just a rechamber and depending on the cartridge a modified extractor.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 10-04-2002 | 11:30 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Grand Bay, AL
Default RE: Ruger No. 1b (weight issue)

.22 Hornet. It would definitely not be a rechamber.

"Clutz by Nature, Hospitalized by Fate..."

Pyral
pyral is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
camoman33935
Miscellaneous
2
07-04-2009 03:57 PM
statjunk
Guns
15
07-27-2005 08:00 AM
rc1988
Guns
23
10-15-2004 09:27 PM
monsterbuckland
Bowhunting
2
11-13-2003 08:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.