Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-09-2005 | 10:00 AM
  #1  
coolbrze0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

In shooting my 30-06, I've noticed that the 150 gr. and 165 gr. Remington Core-Lokt PSPsboth group well. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between the 2 in terms of accuracy. Which one would be a better choice for whitetails and why?

Also, they are both the same price...
coolbrze0 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2005 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 0
From: Western Nebraska
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

Both kill deer well. I like passthrus and the heavier bullets are slightly better at making exit holes.....go with the 165.
Vapodog is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2005 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I know a number of guys who use 150 gr, equally just as many that use up to 180gr for whitetails, it boils down to accuracy and situation why they choose what they do. Obviously accuracy is moot, so I would then ask yourself what the situation is and pick the appropriate bullet accordingly. ie: If your shots are likely to stretch out 200 or further and/or aim for the boiler room (ribs) then 150 might be better due to it's slightly flatter trajectory. However if you don't expect to shoot longer ranges or most likely 100 yardsor so and/or may take a through bone shot the 165 maybe a better fit.

Either will get it done on whitetail if the guy squeezing the trigger does his!
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2005 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
FastShootingCarts's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

ORIGINAL: coolbrze0

In shooting my 30-06, I've noticed that the 150 gr. and 165 gr. Remington Core-Lokt PSPsboth group well. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between the 2 in terms of accuracy. Which one would be a better choice for whitetails and why?

Also, they are both the same price...
Well, take your pick if there is no difference in accuracy. Both of course would do well when Deer is considered.

There are people who wouldactually consider using a.223 REM. when hunting Deer. You will do fine with either bullet weight.
FastShootingCarts is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2005 | 12:05 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 0
From: Baileysville, WV
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I have killed deer with 150, 165, and 180....take your pick. Either way ol Bambi wont ever know what hit him cept the ground. Id go with whatever grouped best.
Doe Dumper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2005 | 11:55 AM
  #6  
bronko22000's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 5
From: Eastern PA
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I'm with the majority. Take your pick. The deer will never notice the difference. The 150 is probably moving slightly faster but the 165 more than likely has a bit heavier jacket for a more controlled expansion on heavier game like bear or elk and you will more than likely get better penetration with the 165 on a quartering shot. Broadside, both should pass through but the 150 will probably open up more causing a larger wound channel.
bronko22000 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2005 | 02:01 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: North West Arkansas
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I'd go with the 150's on whitetail. You should still get pass throughs. Shooting 165 Nosler partitions in my 06 it seemed like they didn't open up much at all. I just think that on whitetails the 150 is all you need and you'll get a bit more velocity and flatter trajectory

firstshot
--------------------------------
Make your first shot count!
firstshot is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2005 | 05:29 PM
  #8  
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

You will find the trajectories of the 150 and 165 to be nearly identical due to the BC of the 165 being higher than the 150. The 165 will also buck the wind much better on a long shot. So you have equal trajectory, less wind drift, and better penetration with the 165. I say 165.
Scott Gags is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2005 | 06:08 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I preferthe 165's but both do the job

TrophyTracker is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HighDesertWolf
Reloading
10
03-06-2007 06:36 AM
sam52
Black Powder
7
04-26-2006 07:21 PM
.358
Reloading
0
04-08-2004 08:56 PM
doc623
Black Powder
3
12-18-2002 12:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.