.223 or 22-250?
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From:
Which is better for a long range varmint gun the .223 or the 22-250? I want to use it on prairie dogs and 'yotes. I saw some pictures of the new Tikka varmints...SWEET! Looks like they'll be available in .223, .22-250, and .308. Pretty sure I don't want the .308, so that narrows it down to the other two.
Thanks for the input.
Thanks for the input.
#2
Both would be fine for the application you mentioned. I would choose the 22-250 as I believe it has a bit more range than the .223. Either way you can't go wrong. IMHO
#5
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: MISSOURI
If you want to compare two cal. its better to compare the 22.250 to the 220 swift not .223. And both are great long range cal. The .220 swift has been the standard for which many manufactures have compared there round too. give it a look.
#7
Fork Horn
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Maine
I have both. The 22-250 has a higher velocity and a little better range but the .223 is dirt cheap to shoot. I also get a little better accuracy with the .223 factory ammo. If you are reloading I would go with the 22-250.
#8
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From:
I don't reload at the moment, but do plan on starting soon. The varmint rifle is on the back burner for a little while as I'm buying something bigger for elk. Just saw some pictures of the new Tikka varmint rifle and started drooling. That got me wondering about which was the better caliber. Thanks for all the input.
#9
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,395
Likes: 0
From:
Buy them both if you can. The 22-250 is the better choice for longer range shooting.
I own them both, I shoot the 223 more often than he 22-250. I just like the idea of burning less powder & keeping my barrel cool longer.
I own them both, I shoot the 223 more often than he 22-250. I just like the idea of burning less powder & keeping my barrel cool longer.


