Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Firearm Review Forum
 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag. >

300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2005, 07:50 AM
  #11  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

ORIGINAL: ELKINMTCWB

300 wetherby.
why in the would would he want a weatherby?

I have had them all. The RUM is more powerful by a good lot. I was kicking 180gr bullets out at 3350fps. I hate the freebore and belt of the weatherby. And more expensive to reload.And much more expensive for factory ammo.But, but, you can get top quality brass for the weatherby. Which isa plus.

But honestly, I have had it with the RUM and weatherby. I burned out one barrel completely under 1000 rounds. And the last one was a custom had heat cracks within 500 rounds. I loved the power of the round.

So for me, I only go with the win mag or WSM. Take your pick. I am a Short action guy, so I go with the WSM.
 
Old 11-07-2005, 07:51 AM
  #12  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

ORIGINAL: tykempster

300 RUM has alot more recoil than a WSM and not that big of an advantage.
How do ya figure? Is this what you have found wth your WSM and RUM's?
 
Old 11-07-2005, 10:19 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

ORIGINAL: ELKINMTCWB

300 wetherby.
The 300ultramag provide superior ballistics without the weatherby freebore.



ORIGINAL: tykempster

300 RUM has alot more recoil than a WSM and not that big of an advantage.
Just how much experience do you actually have with these cartridges?



stubblejumper is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 10:34 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,263
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

The RUM is excellent. A friend last week bagged a nice elk here with his at 477 yards (measured on a laser rangefinder).
rick_reno is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 04:35 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Reinholds, Pennsylvania
Posts: 163
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

300 wsm, i just wouldnt want to put up with that ten extra ft pounds of recoil.

(data off of chuck hawks)

Mike
whitetailhunter4637 is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 08:46 PM
  #16  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

Now that the dinosaurs are all gone, I will stick to the 308 for a 30 caliber.. If I needed a Magnu it would be the 300 Win Mag or 300 WSM.
James B is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 10:01 PM
  #17  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

James, James James, how many times do you need to be told, it ain't about need. Nobody needs a rifle for hunting. In fact your 308 is overkill compared to a bow. Thats all we need, but it is sure fun getting payback for them critters staying out of range during bow season.
 
Old 11-08-2005, 12:21 PM
  #18  
 
tykempster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 270
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

Chuckhawks is where I found most of my info about 300 RUM and WSM. Wsm is alot more popular around where I live and ammo is much cheaper. I don't think the ballistic advantages of the RUM over the WSM is enough to put up with the high shell cost and high recoil.
tykempster is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 03:07 PM
  #19  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

Well, it depends. Number one, I would never use a 300WSM or 300RUM on deer. But when reading all these internet pages, people tints thier articles on thier rurthers. For instance, at 500 yards with a 300RUM you would have the same energy and velocity as a 300WSM at 350. Now thats a big statment. Now, as a person who has shot at moose that far, yea it matters. Its a big heavy boned animal that can be tough.

I agree the WSM is the way to go for most hunters, but I base that off of actually having both.
 
Old 11-08-2005, 03:38 PM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

It should also be mentioned that the 300wsm is loaded quite hot from the factory,while the factory 300ultramag loads are very mild.When you use handloads,the gap widens significantly.
stubblejumper is offline  


Quick Reply: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.