Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Crossbows
 Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string? >

Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

Community
Crossbows This is the place to discuss hunting with crossbows and crossbow equipment. This is NOT a crossbow debate forum.

Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-27-2008, 07:03 AM
  #11  
Spike
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 43
Default RE: Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

ORIGINAL: smokepolehall
if you want 30 in and endless loop you go 15 full wraps, 15 on each side, 2 sides 30 stands. its the End loops,that will only have 15 strands that will be weaker
Sorry to be the fly in the soup, but not so! (although a common mistake)

The loop of an endless loop string is EXACTLY as strong as the string itself. True, it has half the strands, but the tention on the string is equaly devided between the two "glands" of the loop. So half the strands carry half the load. (It's also truefor the very tip of the loop)

This is basic mechanical engineering (and I had my share...)

Indeed, the flemish has stronger loops than the endless, but having a loop twice as strong as the string, has no value.

It may have some value if there isserious stress consentration in the loop, like around sharp cornets. But I suspect that's not the case thanks to the cushioning provided by the serving, and the elasticity of the string (in dacron).

It does puzzle me why is the concensus that flemish is faster (not that I know otherwise). Flemish is much more twisted than endless, so it's bound to have more mass per inch. It has more surface, and a non-smooth one (ie, less airodynamic).

So how can a heavier string with more drag be faster?
lyuv is offline  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:22 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: arkansas
Posts: 3,147
Default RE: Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

It does puzzle me why is the concensus that flemish is faster (not that I know otherwise). Flemish is much more twisted than endless, so it's bound to have more mass per inch. It has more surface, and a non-smooth one (ie, less airodynamic).
I'm not an expert on strings by any means but here's a view from the cheap seats. Most of the string discussions pertain to Excals. For quite some time they have offered a FFF string. That stands for Flemish twist, Fast Flyte matl.

The reason FFF is faster than endless loop is the string matl doesn't stretch as much on the shot cycle, not due to the loop type.

It wasn't until the last year or so the custom string makers like "Boo" and a few others offered them for the public. Now, you can get virtually any thing from them and it's kinda blurred the basic differences in strings from what was once only simple mass produced choices from the factories in the past.

I take it you may be an engineer? Haven't you guys proved bumble bee's and helicopters can't actually fly?
awshucks is offline  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:36 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
Default RE: Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

I'm sure from an engineering standpoint, the loops in endless strings are just as strong as the body of the string. But I question your contention that "having a loop twice as strong as the string has no value." Two reasons: 1) I've had many endless loop strings break, nearly ALWAYS in one loop or the other and only very rarely in the body. 2) Not one single flemish string has ever broken on one of my bows.

Now, it might be possible the reason for that is you can readily see when the loop is damaged with a flemish string while any damage to an endless loop is hidden under the serving. That's a visual indicator to tell you it's time to change the string. Or, when several strands are damaged in the loop, an endless string could be weakened enough to break while the extra strands in a flemish loop give you built in redundant safeguards to keep it from breaking.

Either way, there is a real, tangible value to flemish strings' stronger loops.
Arthur P is offline  
Old 07-27-2008, 11:38 AM
  #14  
Dnk
Nontypical Buck
 
Dnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,896
Default RE: Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?

At the loop there is twice the tensile strength because there is twice the thread count. There is twice the cushioning as well. But the main thing is that there is twice the number of string material to wear/abrade against each other which really is the biggest problem which is of course accelerated by everyone's lack of maintenance. Flemish strings, by virtue of their construction(twist) decelerate the string in a more gentle manner by acting as a shock absorber. The ripping and rubbing of the strands against each other is not nearly as violent.
Dnk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TerryM
Crossbows
5
12-16-2008 08:17 AM
calebwill
Traditional Archery
23
06-28-2007 10:32 AM
BlueGrass Man
Traditional Archery
1
10-19-2006 03:14 PM
newman1
Traditional Archery
2
01-22-2006 09:33 AM
Hobbes
Traditional Archery
7
10-10-2002 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Excalibur Excel Crossbow String or flemish string?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.